<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="pixel-app" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Yourlawyer.com (Diseases News)</title>
	<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_area/diseases</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:15:03 -0700</pubDate>

	<generator>pixel-app</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Two More Long Island Schools Report MRSA Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15290</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MRSA&mdash;methilcillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;has struck two more Long Island schools this week.&nbsp; One student from Centereach High School and a &quot;non-teaching staff&quot; member at East Islip High School were both diagnosed with MRSA.&nbsp; Both cases were reported on their respective school district Websites, meant to inform parents in the districts; however, neither alert details the exact diagnosis or reporting...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a>&mdash;methilcillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;has struck two more Long Island schools this week.&nbsp; One student from Centereach High School and a &quot;non-teaching staff&quot; member at East Islip High School were both diagnosed with MRSA.&nbsp; Both cases were reported on their respective school district Websites, meant to inform parents in the districts; however, neither alert details the exact diagnosis or reporting dates.&nbsp; It is not mandatory that MRSA diagnoses be reported to officials.&#8232;&#8232;<br /><br />The Middle Country School District, which operates Centereach said, &quot;The student has not been in school this week&quot; and that custodial staff has been &quot;working diligently on a nightly basis to disinfect the building since the recent outbreaks in neighboring districts.&quot;&#8232; East Islip reported, &quot;We understand that this individual is responding well to treatment.&quot;&nbsp; East Islip officials also wrote: &quot;Our district is taking several important steps to ensure, to the best of our abilities, that our families and staff are protected.&nbsp; Custodians in the building are cleaning all common areas like locker rooms and bathrooms with &hellip; a common anti-bacterial agent.&quot;&nbsp; Meanwhile, the Suffolk County Department of Health reported 10 MRSA cases this year, bringing the total to 12.<br /><br />MRSA is a mutated staph that when not treated early, is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this drug is being used more and more and, as a result, MRSA is developing resistance to this last successful medication.&nbsp; MRSA, formerly only seen in hospitals and other health care facilities is now mainstreaming and has been seen to cause skin infections in healthy people who have not recently been hospitalized, the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/ar_mrsa_ca.html">Center for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) reports.&nbsp; MRSA often first presents as boils, pimples, or sores that resemble spider bites, and is most often transmitted by skin-to-skin contact, especially in crowded areas like schools.&#8232;&#8232;MRSA can generally be easily treated by a physician in its early stages; however, when left untreated, it can ultimately prove fatal.<br /><br />According to the CDC&mdash;which last month launched the National MRSA Education Initiative to teach parents how to protect children from skin infections caused by MRSA bacteria&mdash;MRSA is typically transmitted by direct skin-to-skin contact, from infected surfaces, or by sharing towels and other personal items.&nbsp; Lesions can be among MRSA&rsquo;s symptoms; initial signs and symptoms include a bump or infected area that may be red, swollen, painful, warm, or may contain pus.&nbsp; Fever may be another symptom.&nbsp; Americans make over 12 million annual visits to doctors for skin infections such as those caused by staph; in some areas of the U.S., MRSA accounts for over half of such skin infections.&nbsp; In 2006, 94,000 Americans developed MRSA and CDC estimates place 2006&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000, with 2,000 healthy people contracting community-based MRSA.<br /><br />MRSA is a fully preventable disease and very treatable in early stages.&nbsp; With early and proper diagnosis the infection is easily treated with general-purpose antibiotics, the sore is bandaged and kept clean, and the infection is cured.&nbsp; Without treatment or with incorrect diagnosis and treatment, the infection spreads rapidly and can lead to respiratory failure and surgeries, attacking vital organs like the lungs and heart.&nbsp; Survivors are not always returned to their pre-MRSA condition, losing limbs, hearing, and full use of damaged organs.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>More Reported MRSA Cases in Long Island Schools</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15230</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New York, school officials are reporting that students in towns across Long Island are being diagnosed with MRSA.&nbsp; Students in Commack and Westhampton Beach have been diagnosed with MRSA, bringing the total of children who have contracted the infection to four reported cases in approximately two weeks.MRSA, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a mutated staph that has emerged in recent years and, when not treated early, is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In New York, school officials are reporting that students in towns across Long Island are being diagnosed with <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a>.&nbsp; Students in Commack and Westhampton Beach have been diagnosed with MRSA, bringing the total of children who have contracted the infection to four reported cases in approximately two weeks.<br /><br />MRSA, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a mutated staph that has emerged in recent years and, when not treated early, is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this drug is being used more and more and, as a result, MRSA is developing resistance to this last successful medication.&nbsp; MRSA, formerly only seen in hospitals and other health care facilities is now mainstreaming and has been seen to cause skin infections in healthy people who have not recently been hospitalized, the<a href="http://www.cdc.gov/"> Center for Disease Control and Prevention</a> (CDC) reports.<br /><br />On Friday, James Feltman, superintendent of the Commack school district, sent an e-mail to parents advising them that a North Ridge Primary School student was diagnosed with MRSA.&nbsp; The district was scheduled to disinfect that school and the Burr Intermediate School this weekend.&nbsp; The second school was being disinfected because a sibling of the sick student attends that school.&nbsp; The two children's school buses were pulled from their routes, also for disinfection.&nbsp; Superintendent Lynn Schwartz advised that the Westhampton Beach High School student was diagnosed late last week and returned to school after being treated.&nbsp; All affected areas were sanitized and parents were notified and advised to follow recommended guidelines.<br /><br />According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention&mdash;which this month launched the National MRSA Education Initiative to teach parents how to protect children from skin infections caused by MRSA bacteria&mdash;MRSA is typically transmitted by direct skin-to-skin contact, from infected surfaces, or by sharing towels and other personal items.&nbsp; Lesions can be among MRSA&rsquo;s symptoms; initial signs and symptoms include a bump or infected area that may be red, swollen, painful, warm, or may contain pus.&nbsp; Fever may be another symptom.&nbsp; Americans make over 12 million annual visits to doctors for skin infections such as those caused by staph; in some areas of the U.S., MRSA accounts for over half of such skin infections.&nbsp; In 2006, 94,000 Americans developed MRSA and CDC estimates place 2006&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000, with 2,000 healthy people contracting community-based MRSA.<br /><br />MRSA is a fully preventable disease and very treatable in early stages.&nbsp; With early and proper diagnosis&mdash;when there is a small eruption on the skin and before MRSA reaches the bloodstream&mdash;the infection is easily treated with general-purpose antibiotics, the sore is bandaged and kept clean, and the infection is cured.&nbsp; There is no down time and patients can resume activities with no risk of falling ill or contaminating others.&nbsp; Without treatment or with incorrect diagnosis and treatment, the infection spreads rapidly and can lead to respiratory failure and surgeries, attacking vital organs like the lungs and heart.&nbsp; Survivors are not always returned to their pre-MRSA condition, losing limbs, hearing, and full use of damaged organs.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Denture Creams Associated with Zinc Poisoning, Neuropathy and Neurological Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15216</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denture creams, used by millions of people to keep their dentures in place, can cause serious health problems.&nbsp; Denture creams, such as PoliGrip and Fixodent, contain zinc, which if ingested in large amounts, can lead to copper deficiency, neurological problems and even a nerve disorder called neuropathy.&nbsp;&nbsp; Unfortunately, most denture cream users have no idea that these products are potentially dangerous, because denture cream...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/Denture-Cream-Zinc-Poisoning">Denture creams</a>, used by millions of people to keep their dentures in place, can cause serious health problems.&nbsp; Denture creams, such as PoliGrip and Fixodent, contain zinc, which if ingested in large amounts, can lead to copper deficiency, neurological problems and even a nerve disorder called neuropathy.&nbsp;&nbsp; Unfortunately, most denture cream users have no idea that these products are potentially dangerous, because denture cream manufacturers are not required to include safety warnings on the product labels.<br /><br />For several years, it has been know that zinc-containing denture creams could cause neurological problems if too much was used.&nbsp; GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Super PoliGrip, has faced lawsuits filed by people who claim that they suffer from zinc poisoning caused by the product. One lawsuit, filed in 2006 by a man who had used Super PoliGrip for eight years, claimed that zinc in the product was responsible for his neuropathy.&nbsp; Neuropathy is a nerve disorder that causes debilitating pain in the extremities.&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /><br />Earlier this summer, the journal &quot;Neurology&quot; reported on four people suffering from zinc poisoning that was likely caused by denture creams.&nbsp; All of the patients exhibited neurological symptoms typical of zinc poisoning.&nbsp; In all four cases, the patients usually used up two tubes of denture cream in a single week.&nbsp; One tube of denture cream should last a minimum of&nbsp; three weeks.&nbsp; Several of the patients had lost their teeth at a very early age, so they were exposed to excessive amounts of these product over a very long period of time.<br /><br />The denture creams the patients used were tested for zinc concentrations, which ranged between 17,000 and 34,000 micrograms per gram.&nbsp; The National Academy of Sciences stated in 2001 that the largest daily tolerable zinc intake is 40 mg. But based on the patients&rsquo; denture cream use, the researchers estimated that they were exposed to at least 330 mg of zinc daily, far more than the recommended daily allowance of 8 mg for women and 11 mg for men.&nbsp; Blood tests indicated that all four had excessively high levels of zinc in their blood.<br /><br />Unfortunately, the patients in these case studies did not improve a great deal once they stopped using dental cream.&nbsp; One patient&rsquo;s neurological symptoms included weakness in the hands and poor balance, while another had weakness in her arms and legs that made her wheelchair dependent, along with cognitive decline and urinary incontinence. These patients showed &ldquo;mild neurologic improvement&rdquo; after they quit using denture cream and began taking copper supplements.<br /><br />Another patient took copper supplements but didn&rsquo;t stop using denture cream. His copper levels improved, but his zinc levels remained too high and he showed no improvement in his neurological symptoms. The fourth patient, who took copper supplements and stopped using denture cream, showed improvement in copper and zinc levels, but no improvement in neurological symptoms.<br /><br />With 35 million people using denture creams, zinc poisoning from these products has the potential to become a big public health problem.&nbsp; But the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/">Food &amp; Drug Administration</a> (FDA) doesn't require denture cream makers to list ingredients or potential health risks on their product labels.&nbsp; Denture creams are considered a Class I medical device by the FDA.&nbsp; This means that as far as the FDA is concerned,&nbsp; denture creams are low-risk.&nbsp; Without an FDA requirement to do so, the makers of denture creams have been unwilling to provide such information to consumers.<br /><br />While the FDA has failed to protect denture wearers from these dangerous products, there are some things individuals can do to protect themselves.&nbsp; Above all, denture creams should not be used in excess.&nbsp; Often people with poorly fitting dentures will use large amounts of denture creams to fix the problem.&nbsp; But it is far safer to seek professional help to have ill-fitting dentures refitted or replaced.&nbsp; Finally, people with dentures should be sure to see their dentist at least once a year, in order to make sure their dentures are fitting properly.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Use Among Kids Could Lead to Brain Cancer Epidemic</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15179</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children and teens who use cell phones are five times more likely to get brain cancer, according to a new study.&nbsp; The new research raises fears that today's young people may suffer an &quot;epidemic&quot; of the brain cancer in later life.Concern has been growing about the health risks of cell phone use for some time.&nbsp; In July, the director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers issued an internal...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Children and teens who use cell phones are five times more likely to get <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">brain cancer</a>, according to a new study.&nbsp; The new research raises fears that today's young people may suffer an &quot;epidemic&quot; of the brain cancer in later life.<br /><br />Concern has been growing about the health risks of cell phone use for some time.&nbsp; In July, the director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers issued an internal advisory memo to about 3,000 faculty and staff members advising them to take precautions to avoid the possible cancer risks of cell phones.&nbsp; It marked the first time that a major U.S. cancer center had ever issued such an advisory.&nbsp; The memo advised that children - whose brains are still developing - only use cell phones in emergencies. Adults should keep the phone away from the head and use the speakerphone or a wireless headset, the memo said.<br /><br />This latest study, conducted by Swedish researchers,&nbsp; found that teenagers who started using mobiles at young age were five times more likely to suffer from glioma, a type of primary central nervous system&nbsp; tumor that arises from glial cells.&nbsp; And, those who started using cell phones in their 20s were twice as likely to get the tumor.<br /><br />According to lead researcher Lennart Hardell of University Hospital Orebro, kids&rsquo; thinner skulls and developing nervous systems make them particularly vulnerable to tumors, and as their heads are smaller and their skulls are thinner, the electromagnetic radiation from cell phones penetrates deeper into their brains.<br /><br />&quot;This is a warning sign. It's very worrying. We should be taking precautions&quot; Prof Hardell said, adding children under 12 should use cell phones only in case of emergencies and that teenagers should use hands-free devices or headsets.<br /><br />Other researchers have also raised alarms over cell phone dangers this past year.&nbsp; Earlier this year, an Australian neurosurgeon published a paper on the Internet saying cell phone use &ldquo;has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking.&rdquo; The doctor, Vini Khurana, analyzed data from more than 100 studies, and concluded that most weren&rsquo;t long enough to uncover a risk of brain cancer and that children haven&rsquo;t been adequately studied.<br /><br />A few small studies have also indicated a link between cell phones and some types of tumors. For instance, earlier this year, a study conducted by researchers at Tel Aviv University found a link between prolonged cell phone use and cancer. According to the study, people who use cell phones for lengthy periods of time every day were 50 percent more likely to develop both benign or malignant tumors in their parotid gland, the main saliva-producing gland that is located between the jaw and ear.<br /><br />Last week, the European Parliament voted to recommend tighter safety standards for cell phones. In light of the growing body of scientific evidence implicating cell phone use with brain tumors, the Parliament says, &quot;The limits on exposure to electromagnetic fields which have been set for the general public are obsolete.&quot; <br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Revlimid Linked to Steven-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15169</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revlimid, a blood cancer drug made by Celgene Corp., has been associated with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis, serious and potentially fatal skin disorders. A spokesperson for Celgene told The Wall Street Journal that it&nbsp; is likely the label for Revlimid would be updated in the future to include reports of the skin reactions.Revlimid was the first of Celgene's new class of oral cancer drugs called IMiDs...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Revlimid, a blood cancer drug made by Celgene Corp., has been associated with <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/stevens_johnson_syndrome">Stevens-Johnson Syndrome</a> and <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/toxic_epidermal_necrolysis">toxic epidermal necrolysis</a>, serious and potentially fatal skin disorders. A spokesperson for Celgene told The Wall Street Journal that it&nbsp; is likely the label for Revlimid would be updated in the future to include reports of the skin reactions.<br /><br />Revlimid was the first of Celgene's new class of oral cancer drugs called IMiDs (immunomodulatory drug). IMiDs modify or regulate the functioning of the immune system.&nbsp; Revlimid was approved in December 2005 to treat a bone-marrow disorder known as myelodysplastic syndromes and later approved for multiple myeloma, a type of blood cancer.<br /><br />According to a newsletter posted on the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) website, the agency has received 14 reports of&nbsp; Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis through January 2008. The agency said it received three reports of deaths in patients with the skin conditions, though in one case the cause of death was listed as the progression of a type of blood cancer.<br /><br />The agency said eight of the patients had reported either taking or previously being on other drugs that could have also caused the skin reactions. However, the FDA said in at least two cases it appeared that Revlimid played a role in the development of skin reactions.<br /><br />Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a hypersensitivity complex affecting the skin and the mucous membrane.&nbsp; The disorder causes blistering of mucous membranes, typically in the mouth, eyes, and vagina, and patchy areas of rash.&nbsp; Toxic epidermal necrolysis presents with a similar blistering of mucous membranes. However, in addition to blistering, the entire epidermis peels off in sheets from large areas of the body. Both disorders can be life threatening.<br /><br />Information about Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic epidermal necrolysis is currently not included on the Revlimid label.&nbsp; The FDA said doctors need to be aware of the possibility that Revlimid could cause serious skin reactions, and said the drug should be discontinued if a skin rash appears.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>New National CDC Campaign Targets MRSA</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15129</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just launched the National MRSA Education Initiative to teach parents how to protect children from skin infections caused by dangerous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria.MRSA is a mutated staph that has emerged in recent years and, when not treated early, is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just launched the National MRSA Education Initiative to teach parents how to protect children from skin infections caused by dangerous <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)</a> bacteria.<br /><br />MRSA is a mutated staph that has emerged in recent years and, when not treated early, is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this drug is being used more and more and, as a result, MRSA is developing resistance to this last successful medication.&nbsp; MRSA can cause severe infections in people in hospitals and other health care facilities and now has also been seen to cause skin infections in healthy people who have not recently been hospitalized, the CDC said.<br /><br />Americans make over 12 million annual visits to doctors for skin infections such as those caused by staph; in some areas of the U.S., MRSA accounts for over half of such skin infections.&nbsp; In 2006, 94,000 Americans developed MRSA with most infected in healthcare facilities.&nbsp; Previously limited to hospital and nursing home patients, MRSA is now striking and killing in communities.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">CDC</a> estimates place 2006&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000 Americans, with 2,000 healthy people contracting community-based MRSA.&nbsp; That figure is expected to increase.<br /><br />MRSA is spread through direct contact with an infection, sharing personal items such as towels or razors that have touched infected skin, or by touching MRSA contaminated surfaces.&nbsp; Parents need to teach children about the very early signs and symptoms of MRSA skin infections, which initially appear as a bump or infected area that may be red, swollen, painful, warm, or may contain pus. Fever may be another symptom.<br /><br />MRSA is a fully preventable disease and very treatable in early stages.&nbsp; With early and proper diagnosis&mdash;when there is a small eruption on the skin and before MRSA reaches the bloodstream&mdash;the infection is easily treated with general-purpose antibiotics, the sore is bandaged and kept clean, and the infection is cured.&nbsp; There is no down time and patients can resume activities with no risk of falling ill or contaminating others.&nbsp; Without treatment or with incorrect diagnosis and treatment, the infection spreads rapidly and can lead to respiratory failure and surgeries, attacking vital organs like the lungs and heart.&nbsp; Survivors are not always returned to their pre-MRSA condition, losing limbs, hearing, and full use of damaged organs.<br /><br />The new National MRSA Education Initiative highlights specific measures parents can take to protect themselves and their families from such MRSA infections and includes Websites, fact sheets, brochures, posters, radio and print public service announcements, blogging sites for moms, Web banners, and mainstream media interviews.&nbsp; Information on the campaign and MRSA prevention will be shared through community and school groups, professional organizations, faith-based groups, and national health conferences.&nbsp; The CDC said parents need to help children keep their cuts and scrapes clean and covered and to encourage children to have good hand washing and hygiene habits.&nbsp; &quot;Well-informed parents are a child's best defense against MRSA and other skin infections.&nbsp; Recognizing the signs and receiving treatment in the early stages of a skin infection reduces the chances of infection becoming severe or spreading,&quot; Dr. Rachel Gorwitz, a pediatrician and medical epidemiologist with CDC's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, said.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Cancer Patients Receive Insufficient Pain Therapy</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15122</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among cancer patients, pain is one of the most common symptoms.&nbsp; Unfortunately, many cancer patients are not receiving sufficient and appropriate therapy for the pain caused by either or both their cancer or their cancer treatments; this, according to a study appearing in the September 1 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.&nbsp; The publication is the official journal of the American Society for...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Among <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer</a> patients, pain is one of the most common symptoms.&nbsp; Unfortunately, many cancer patients are not receiving sufficient and appropriate therapy for the pain caused by either or both their cancer or their cancer treatments; this, according to a study appearing in the September 1 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.&nbsp; The publication is the official journal of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.<br /><br />For cancer patients, pain can originate from the cancer itself, but can also originate from chronic inflammatory changes and even infections.&nbsp; Further, traditional cancer treatments, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, can also cause the patient&rsquo;s pain.&nbsp; Clearly, pain is common in cancer patients as part of their disease, as part of their disease&rsquo;s treatment, and as part of the results of their disease and its treatments; however, despite the frequency of the pain, cancer and cancer-related pain is improperly managed, becoming an ongoing and frequent source of patient anxiety due to its improper management.<br /><br />Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the Radiation Oncology Branch of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, worked to determine the main reasons that patients fail to receive optimal pain therapy.&nbsp; As part of the study, between November 2005 and April 2006, 106 radiation therapy patients responded to an Internet-based questionnaire that evaluated their medication use; the pain control they experienced; and their attitudes toward pain medication, including prescription and over-the-counter drugs.&nbsp; Of the respondents, 58 percent reported pain that they experienced directly from their cancer treatment and 46 percent of the patient respondents reported that they experienced pain directly from their cancer.&nbsp; Of those respondents, 80 percent of the patients reported that they did not use medications to manage their pain.<br /><br />Sadly, the majority of the patients reporting that they suffered from pain as a result of their cancer or its treatment said that the primary reason they did not take pain medication was because their healthcare provider did not recommend such medications.&nbsp; Patients also reported that they feared becoming addicted or dependent on pain medication and also reported having an inability to pay for such pain medication.&nbsp; Some patients also reported using alternative, non medication, therapies for their pain relief, such as physical therapy, massage, and acupuncture, to name a few.<br /><br />&quot;To eliminate barriers to optimal pain management for cancer patients, healthcare providers should talk with their patients about pain symptoms and pain medications,&quot; Charles Simone, M.D., a resident at the National Cancer Institute Radiation Oncology Branch in Bethesda, Md. and lead author of the study, said.&nbsp; &quot;At our institution we have taken these steps by transitioning to an electronic medical record system that has been designed to require an evaluation and documentation of patient pain levels and pain medication responses by healthcare providers at each patient encounter<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Microwave Popcorn Caused Lung Disease, Lawsuit Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15098</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microwave popcorn caused a Washington state man to develop a&nbsp; potentially fatal ailment,&nbsp; a new lawsuit claims.&nbsp; The disease, bronchiolitis obliterans - also known as Popcorn Workers Lung - has been linked to diacetyl, a chemical used to give microwave popcorn and other snack foods a buttery flavor.Popcorn Workers Lung is a potentially life threatening ailment, for which the only cure is a lung transplant. In 2003 and 2004, the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microwave popcorn caused a Washington state man to develop a&nbsp; potentially fatal ailment,&nbsp; a new lawsuit claims.&nbsp; The disease, bronchiolitis obliterans - also known as <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/popcorn_workers_lung">Popcorn Workers Lung</a> - has been linked to diacetyl, a chemical used to give microwave popcorn and other snack foods a buttery flavor.<br /><br />Popcorn Workers Lung is a potentially life threatening ailment, for which the only cure is a lung transplant. In 2003 and 2004, the National Institute on Occupational Safety and Health found an association between the toxic substance and the development of Popcorn Workers Lung among hundreds of workers at six Midwestern popcorn factories. In April 2007, the <a href="http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/flavoringlung/healtheffects.html">Centers for Disease Control</a>&nbsp; reported that workers at food flavoring factories, as well as popcorn plants, were at risk for the disease.<br /><br />Popcorn Workers Lung is a very rare disease, and it was thought to be limited to people working in the flavorings industry. But in July 2007, the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) was informed that a patient who had consumed at least one bag of microwave popcorn every day over a 15 year period had been diagnosed with Popcorn Workers Lung.&nbsp; This was the first such report of the disease in a consumer, and the FDA is currently investigating the incident.<br /><br />Larry Newkirk, a Spokane, Washington businessman, was diagnosed with Popcorn Workers lung last month.&nbsp; Newkirk told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer that up until last year, he would eat six to seven bags of microwave popcorn every day - &quot;especially the ones with lots of butter that taste like you're going to the theater.&quot;&nbsp; Newkirk's lawsuit claims that his illness was caused by breathing in diacetyl vapors that were released from the popcorn.<br /><br />Newkirk began having breathing problems several years ago.&nbsp; He spent two years going from doctor to doctor, but was unable to find an answer to his ailment.&nbsp; Then,&nbsp; he started hearing stories about popcorn factory workers developing bronchiolitis obliterans, and its link to diacetyl.&nbsp; Newkirk stopped his popcorn habit last fall.<br /><br />Finally, Newkirk went to see Dr. Allen Parmet, a nationally known authority in occupational medicine.&nbsp; It was Dr. Parmet who diagnosed Newkirk with Popcorn Workers Lung.&nbsp; According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Newkirk is only the second person in the U.S. diagnosed with Popcorn Workers Lung, although other home users of popcorn are undergoing medical evaluation at this time.<br /><br />Newkirks lawsuit names ConAgra Foods, the maker of the ACT II popcorn that he once ate on a daily basis, as a defendant in his lawsuit.&nbsp; The suit also names Shopko Stores, where he bought the product, and at least five national and international companies that make or have made the diacetyl-based flavoring, as co-defendants. <br /><br />In 2007, several makers of microwave popcorn, including ConAgra, General Mills and American Popcorn Co., took steps to remove diacetyl from their products.&nbsp; There has also been a movement to convince federal regulators to police the use of diacetyl in the workplace, but those efforts have had mixed results.&nbsp; The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which sets limits on how much of a dangerous substance a worker can be subjected to, said in 2000 that it had no standards for the flavoring and that it wasn&rsquo;t a problem because the FDA considered diacetyl &ldquo;safe.&rdquo;&nbsp;&nbsp; For its part, the FDA has maintained that it has no jurisdiction to evaluate hazards posed by breathing vapors from food additives.&nbsp;&nbsp; It was only last year that OSHA started to investigate diacetyl exposure in snack food industry workers, and that agency is expected to look into setting standards for workers next month.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Dilantin Injection Reportedly Causing Purple Glove Syndrome, FDA Says</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15100</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a quarterly report it released last week, the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating instances were&nbsp; Dilantin (phenytoin) injections led to a disorder known as Purple Glove Syndrome.&nbsp; This condition, which was named for the discoloration that often accompanies it, can lead to the need for emergency surgery, and even limb amputation, if it becomes serious.Phenytoin is an antiepileptic drug. Aside from...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to a quarterly report it released last week, the Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating instances were&nbsp; Dilantin (phenytoin) injections led to a disorder known as <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/purple-glove-syndrome">Purple Glove Syndrome</a>.&nbsp; This condition, which was named for the discoloration that often accompanies it, can lead to the need for emergency surgery, and even limb amputation, if it becomes serious.<br /><br />Phenytoin is an antiepileptic drug. Aside from seizures, it is an option in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia as well as certain cardiac arrhythmias. In the US, phenytoin is marketed as Phenytek and Dilantin (including Dilantin Kapseals, Dilantin-125 and Dilantin Infatabs).<br /><br />Phenytoin has been administered intravenously since 1956.&nbsp; But occasionally, this treatment can lead to a complication called Purple Glove Syndrome.&nbsp; Purple Glove Syndrome starts as a&nbsp; pale blue or dark purple discoloration which appears around the intravenous insertion site 2&nbsp; to 12 hours after the administration of the drug. Progression occurs during the next 12 to 16 hours as developing edema and continued discoloration spread around all sides of&nbsp; the affected limb. <br /><br />If a patient is fortunate, the discoloration and edema will gradually fade, and the affected limb will heal within 2 to 4 weeks.&nbsp; However, Purple Glove Syndrome can sometimes turn quite serious, resulting in the death of affected tissue. When such necrosis occurs, a patient may require surgery to restore blood flow to the affected tissue.&nbsp; The most severe cases of Purple Glove Syndrome can lead to amputation of the injured limb.<br /><br />In its report, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cder/aers/potential_signals/potential_signals_2008Q1.htm">FDA</a> did not say how many cases of phenytoin-related Purple Glove Syndrome it was investigating.&nbsp; But a 1998 study conducted by researchers at the Mayo Clinic found that of 152 patients receiving intravenous Dilantin (phenytoin), 9&nbsp; (about 5.9%) developed Purple Glove Syndrome.&nbsp; The study also found that the disorder was more likely to affect the elderly, and people who received more than one dose of phenytoin.<br /><br />No one yet understands why intravenous Dilantin can cause Purple Glove Syndrome.&nbsp; The disorder does occur when Dilantin - which has highly alkaline PH - leaks into the interstitial tissue.&nbsp; But Purple Glove Syndrome is also seen in patients were such phenytoin leakage has not occurred.&nbsp; Some health practitioners believe this could have something to do with the exact formulation of the phenytoin injection.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>NSAIDs May Hide Prostate Cancer Risks</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15102</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. researchers report that taking pain relievers such as aspirin and ibuprofen lowers the levels of a protein in a man's blood that doctors use to screen for prostate cancer.&nbsp; The researchers also said it is unclear if this means these men have a lower risk for developing prostate cancer or if these medications create difficulty in detecting prostate tumors using a common screening blood test.&nbsp; NSAIDs are used by millions of people...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[U.S. researchers report that taking pain relievers such as aspirin and ibuprofen lowers the levels of a protein in a man's blood that doctors use to screen for prostate cancer.&nbsp; The researchers also said it is unclear if this means these men have a lower risk for developing prostate cancer or if these medications create difficulty in detecting prostate tumors using a common screening blood test.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/defective_drugs">NSAIDs</a> are used by millions of people for headaches, minor pain, arthritis, lowering fever, and for reducing swelling.&nbsp; Among them are aspirin, ibuprofen (for example:&nbsp; Advil, Motrin) and naproxen (for example:&nbsp; Aleve).<br /><br />The study&mdash;conducted at the University of Rochester Medical Center in Rochester, New York&mdash;involved 1,319 U.S. men age 40 and older and revealed that men who took nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs--NSAIDs,--nearly every day showed prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels of about 10 percent lower than those men who did not take NSAIDs.&nbsp; PSA is a protein produced by cells in the prostate gland; elevated PSA levels in the bloodstream may point to prostate cancer or other prostate conditions.&nbsp; The researchers also said it is too early for men be prescribed NSAIDs for the purpose of lowering prostate cancer risks.<br /><br />Many men have annual blood tests taken to measure PSA levels to screen for prostate cancer.&nbsp; The study reported that NSAIDs could disguise a man's prostate cancer risk by lowering PSA levels while his risk remains unchanged.&nbsp; &quot;If you're a guy who's close to the upper limit of normal (in PSA levels) or would have been over the upper limit and now you're under it because of this, that could certainly change whether or not you would be referred for a biopsy (to check for a tumor),&quot; Dr Eric Singer, one of the researchers, said.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Edwin van Wijngaarden, one of the researchers, said that, &quot;While our results are consistent with other research that indicates that certain painkillers may reduce a man's risk of getting prostate cancer, the new findings are preliminary and don't prove a link.&quot;&nbsp; The study was published in the American Cancer Society's journal Cancer and also found that men who regularly took acetaminophen (Tylenol) also tested with lower PSA levels.&nbsp; Because there of the limited number of men in this study who took acetaminophen, the study&rsquo;s findings regarding acetaminophen use and PSA levels are not considered statistically significant <br /><br />Currently, there is a debate in the medical community concerning the value of PSA testing with some experts saying that routine screening reveals many prostate tumors that pose no threat to a man's life and can lead to unnecessary prostate cancer treatment.&nbsp; Meanwhile, experts are pending the results of clinical trials that are taking place in the United States and Europe that may indicate whether PSA screening actually does save lives.<br /><br />According to the American Cancer Society, prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed form of cancer in men worldwide, with about 780,000 men diagnosed annually.&nbsp; Prostate cancer is also the sixth mostly deadly form of cancer in men, with about 250,000 deaths per year.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>CDC Reports Tobacco Responsible for Over 2 Million US Cancer Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15088</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is reporting that tobacco use is responsible for 2.4 million cases of cancer in the United States from 1999 to 2004, with lung and bronchial cancer accounting for about half of all of the cancer cases.&nbsp; The CDC also found that cancers of the larynx, mouth and pharynx, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, kidney, bladder, and cervix are caused by tobacco as is acute myelogenous leukemia. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[  <p class="PW">The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is reporting that tobacco use is responsible for 2.4 million cases of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer</a> in the United States from 1999 to 2004, with lung and bronchial cancer accounting for about half of all of the cancer cases.&nbsp; The CDC also found that cancers of the larynx, mouth and pharynx, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, kidney, bladder, and cervix are caused by tobacco as is acute myelogenous leukemia.</p>  <p class="PW">&quot;The data in this report provides additional, strong evidence of the serious harm related to tobacco,&quot; said Sherri Stewart of the CDC's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, who led the study.&nbsp; Stewart's team reviewed cancer surveys and registries covering 92 percent of the U.S. population.</p>  <p class="PW">The study revealed that Kentucky had the highest rates of lung cancer among men and women, while Western states with low rates of smoking also had low cancer rates.&nbsp; Tobacco-related cancers were more common among blacks, non-Hispanic whites and men, reflecting the groups that use tobacco more, the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">CDC</a> found.</p>  <p class="PW">&quot;Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of disease and premature death in the United   States and the most prominent cause of cancer,&quot; said the CDC's Dr. Matthew McKenna.&nbsp; &quot;The tobacco-use epidemic causes a third of the cancers in America,&quot; McKenna added.&nbsp; The CDC reports that tobacco use kills 438,000 people prematurely every year, including 38,000 people do not smoke, but suffer the effects of secondhand smoke.&nbsp; &quot;Tobacco use causes more deaths each year than alcohol use, car crashes, suicide, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), homicide, and illegal drug use combined,&quot; the report reads.&nbsp; &quot;In addition, smoking accounts for $167 billion annually in health care expenditures and productivity losses.&quot;</p>  <p class="PW">Cancer is not the only serious health concern that cigarette smoking and secondhand smoke cause.&nbsp; Experts have long known that children are particularly susceptible to the harmful effects of secondhand smoke and that such exposure either prenatally or early in life can raise a child's risk of developing asthma symptoms, and, now, allergies.&nbsp; Secondhand smoke exposure causes respiratory symptoms in children and slows their lung growth and causes sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), acute respiratory infections, ear problems, and more frequent and severe asthma attacks in children.&nbsp; It has also long been believed that prolonged exposure to secondhand smoke can cause lung damage and emphysema.</p>  <p class="PW">In the past, doctors lacked a way to prove this and previous detection methods simply weren&rsquo;t sufficiently sensitive, but ew technologies have enabled researchers to confirm that long-term exposure to secondhand smoke can cause structural damage in the lungs, indicative of emphysema.&nbsp; In recent years, secondhand smoke has emerged as a public health threat, being classified as a carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency and linked to heart disease, lung cancer, and a number of respiratory ailments, including asthma and chronic bronchitis. According to the American Lung Association, 35 percent of American children live in homes where regular smoking occurs.&nbsp; Also, smokers have a higher risk of developing several&nbsp;chronic disorders including atherosclerosis, several types of cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p>  <p class="PW">&nbsp;</p>  ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Study Reveals Fertility Treatments Induce Gene Mutations in Males</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15041</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chinese researchers are reporting that the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or another assisted fertility technique called that is called intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to conceive appears to increase the odds of Y-chromosome defects or &quot;microdeletions&quot; in male offspring.&nbsp; Although this study was small, it &quot;at least sounds an alarm about the genetic safety of assisted reproductive technology,&quot; the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chinese researchers are reporting that the use of in vitro fertilization (IVF) or another assisted fertility technique called that is called intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to conceive appears to increase the odds of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/birth_defects">Y-chromosome defects </a>or &quot;microdeletions&quot; in male offspring.&nbsp; Although this study was small, it &quot;at least sounds an alarm about the genetic safety of assisted reproductive technology,&quot; the investigators conclude.<br /><br />This means that the chromosomal defects, or deletions, could result in defective sperm production and possibly also hypospadias.&nbsp; Hypospadia is a relatively common congenital malformation of the male sex organs in which the urinary outlet, or urethra, does not open through the glans of the penis, but rather, develops on the underside of the penis.&nbsp; This defect makes it difficult for the patient to urinate normally and to control one&rsquo;s stream of urine.&nbsp; Generally, hypospadia occurs because of a hormonal imbalance or deficiency that takes place at a critical point in fetal development prior to birth.&nbsp; Early corrective surgery is generally called for before the child reaches the age of three.<br /><br />Prior research has linked assisted reproductive technologies such as IVF and ICSI with low birth weight, pre-term delivery, cerebral palsy, and major birth defects.&nbsp; Because of this, some researchers believe that such therapies may prompt gene mutations.&nbsp; In this new study, Dr. He-Feng Huang, from Zhejiang University, and colleagues worked to find answers to this issue by testing for genetic mutations in 19 male infants who were conceived through IVF, 18 who were conceived through ICSI, and 60 baby boys were were conceived naturally.&nbsp; In addition, the fathers of the infant boys were also tested.&nbsp; Because the researchers were hoping to isolate the impact of the fertility treatment, they only studied those infants whose parents had a normal genetic background.<br /><br />Huang and his colleagues found Y-chromosome microdeletions in one infant conceived with IVF, representing 5.3 percent of the population tested.&nbsp; Microdeletions were also found in three baby boys conceived with ICSI, which represented 16.7 percent of the population tested. By contrast, no Y-chromosome deletions were seen in the control group.&nbsp; The report also indicated that one of the four infants with microdeletions had hypospadias.<br /><br />The investigators noted that this study is not the first to link ICSI with hypospadias; however, the mechanism has been unclear in the earlier studies. The new findings suggest that the association may be mediated through Y-chromosome microdeletions.<br /><br />ICSI has long been the main method used to overcome male infertility and its use is on the rise. With ICSI, a single sperm is injected directly into a single egg.&nbsp; If successful fertilization occurs, the embryo is then placed into the female&mdash;in IVF treatment&mdash;to undergo development as usual.&nbsp; Fertilization rates&mdash;which are not the same as pregnancy rates&mdash;are relatively high when ICSI is employed with approximately 75%-80% of all eggs manipulated through ICSI becoming fertilized. <br /><br />Larger studies &quot;should be conducted to confirm our preliminary results,&quot; the researchers conclude.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>FDA to Finally Plan for a National Joint Orthopedic Device Registry</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15004</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/15004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in the early stages of developing a program to create a national surveillance registry for orthopedic device implants.&nbsp; The registry would enable the FDA to look into independent public and private registries from which claim information would be fed into a central agency-regulated network. According to an FDA spokesman, orthopedic device manufacturers would benefit from the program because it would...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is in the early stages of developing a program to create a national surveillance registry for <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/defective_medical_devices">orthopedic device implants</a>.&nbsp; The registry would enable the FDA to look into independent public and private registries from which claim information would be fed into a central agency-regulated network. </p><p>According to an FDA spokesman, orthopedic device manufacturers would benefit from the program because it would &ldquo;offer more timely, comprehensive assessment of the &lsquo;real world&rsquo; experience of their devices and an alternative means to conduct mandated post-approval studies.&rdquo;&nbsp; Nevertheless, some caution that such a government-run registry might have too many limitations, given the current budget and resource restrictions plaguing the agency. &ldquo;One of the challenges the FDA and other agencies face is being able to devote resources in a continuing way.&nbsp; And our view is that registries will bring up more questions than answers,&rdquo; David Lewallen, chairman of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons&rsquo; (AAOS) American Joint Replacement Registry Oversight Board and head of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, said. &ldquo;It wouldn&rsquo;t be impossible to do it through a government-run agency, but it is a bigger challenge.&rdquo; </p><p>Another consideration is patient confidentiality. &ldquo;Unless there are some safeguards in place, people would be wary of a federal-run system.&nbsp; It may even discourage some people from reporting adverse events,&rdquo; Lewallen said.&nbsp; Meanwhile, hundreds of patients who received the Zimmer Durom Cup hip implants in the U.S. experienced serious adverse reactions.&nbsp; Since, a prominent surgeon went public with his concerns and patient advocates have been calling for the creation of a national database&mdash;a joint registry.&nbsp; Advocates argue that such a system would quickly alert doctors and federal regulators to devices with high failure rates, possibly sparing tens of thousands of patients from severe, painful injuries.</p><p>Last year, Dr. Lawrence Dorr, a&nbsp;highly experienced orthopedist and Zimmer consultant, noticed that within months of implantation, many of his patients were suffering from crippling pain.&nbsp; X-rays revealed that the Durom socket was separating from the bone, not fusing with it, which required additional, excruciating replacement surgery.&nbsp; Zimmer ignored Dorr and attempted to blame him for the defect, but eventually, Zimmer conducted an investigation and suspended sales of the defective component.&nbsp; Critics argue that it never should have taken so long and, in many countries where joint registries are in place, it would not have.&nbsp; If the U.S. had such a database, Zimmer might have been forced to take the Durom Cup off the market much sooner.</p><p>Some critics believe a more sinister force is responsible for long blocking implementation of a joint registry; specifically the financial arrangements between implant makers and many orthopedic surgeons.&nbsp; Some physicians might be reluctant to report problems with a device if they are receiving compensation from its manufacturer.&nbsp; This would not be the first time surgeons were influenced by the payments they receive from implant makers.&nbsp; Last year, several major&nbsp;manufacturers, including Zimmer and Smith &amp; Nephew, agreed to pay $310 million to settle civil charges and resolve a Department of Justice investigation into whether the firms paid illegal inducements to get some doctors to use their products.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Hemodialysis After MRI with Gadolinium Could Prevent NSF in Some Kidney Patients</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14994</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new&nbsp; study indicates that some kidney patients who undergo hemodialysis&nbsp; following exposure to gadolinium contrast dyes during an MRI may be at less risk of developing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The study, conducted by researchers at Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, was recently published in the journal &quot;Radiology&quot;.NSF is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A new&nbsp; study indicates that some kidney patients who undergo hemodialysis&nbsp; following exposure to gadolinium contrast dyes during an MRI may be at less risk of developing <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/nsf">nephrogenic systemic fibrosis</a> (NSF). The study, conducted by researchers at Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York, was recently published in the journal &quot;Radiology&quot;.<br /><br />NSF is debilitating, and sometimes fatal disease, that affects people with pre-existing kidney diseases who have undergone MRI studies that involve gadolinium contrast dyes. There is currently no cure for NSF and no one understands its specific cause. The disorder is characterized&nbsp; by high blood pressure, burning, itching, swelling and hardening of the skin. Other symptoms include red or dark patches on the skin; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs and muscle weakness. NSF can progress to the point of causing severe stiffness in joints, and it can lead to death. <br /><br />The evidence that gadolinium contrast agents play a role in the development of NSF is fast becoming irrefutable. Dutch scientists made the first connection between NSF and gadolinium in 2006. Since then, researchers at Yale University have reported that 95-percent of those with NSF had undergone a Magnetic Imaging Resonance (MRI) procedure that involved a gadolinium contrast dye two to three months before their symptoms appeared. Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital also have found that kidney patients who had undergone MRIs with gadolinium&nbsp; contrast dyes were 10 times more likely to develop NSF than patient who had not been exposed to such agents.<br /><br />In 2007, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/gcca/default.htm">Food &amp; Drug Administration</a> (FDA) asked the manufacturers of gadolinium contrast dyes to add a black box warning to the product labels about its association with NSF. The FDA also warned that patients with kidney disease should avoid gadolinium contrast agents.<br /><br />For the study detailed in Radiology, researcher analyzed cases of biopsy-confirmed NSF among all patients who received a gadolinium-based contrast agent between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 2007. In total, there were 31 biopsy-confirmed cases of NSF in 10 men and 21 women.&nbsp;&nbsp; The patients ranged in age from 13 to 82 years.<br /><br />The researchers found that hemodialysis helped prevent NSF in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)- a measure of kidney function - of less than 15 mL/min. Increased risk of NSF was associated with patients with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min who received a higher dose of gadolinium contrast dye, and who also experienced acute renal failure, delayed hemodialysis after contrast agent injection, proinflammatory events, and hyperphosphatemia, a condition where there is abnormally elevated level of phosphate in the blood.<br /><br />The study also found that the dosage level of the gadolinium agent played a role in the development of NSF.&nbsp; The occurrence NSF after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration without screening for renal function were 0 of 74,124 patients with a standard gadolinium dose and 15 (0.17%) of 8,997 patients with the high dose. The incidence associated with the high dose increased to 0.4% in the patients who received hemodialysis and increased to 8.8% in patients who had an eGFR less than 15 mL/min but had not received hemodialysis treatment.<br /><br />Eleven of 69 patients with acute renal failure who received a high dose when their creatinine level was increasing developed NSF when hemodialysis was delayed for more than two days.<br /><br />The authors of the study concluded that&nbsp; the chances of&nbsp; a patient developing&nbsp; NSF could be lessened by&nbsp; first identifying those with eGFR in the range of 30 mL/min or less.&nbsp; Those patients should receive a lower dose (no more than 0.1 mmol/kg).&nbsp; Finally, the authors wrote that patients &quot;who have acute renal failure with increasing serum creatinine levels or who are in a dialysis regimen at the time of gadolinium-based contrast agent administration should undergo hemodialysis shortly after the gadolinium-enhanced MR examination.&quot;<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Suit Over Phenytoin Names 10 Defendants in Womans Death</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14965</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  According to court papers, Agnes Davis was prescribed phenytoin and then suffered a severe adverse reaction- Stevens-Johnson Syndrome - that allegedly led to her death.&nbsp; Phenytoin is a generic version of Dilantin.&nbsp; The lawsuit, filed by Willie Davis Jr. and Alice Washington&mdash;Davis&rsquo;s family members&mdash;on August. 8, 2008, names 10 companies that make, label, test, market, or distribute phenytoin.&nbsp; Among other issues,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[  <p class="PW">According to court papers, Agnes Davis was prescribed phenytoin and then suffered a severe adverse reaction- <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/stevens_johnson_syndrome">Stevens-Johnson Syndrome</a> - that allegedly led to her death.&nbsp; Phenytoin is a generic version of Dilantin.&nbsp; The lawsuit, filed by Willie Davis Jr. and Alice Washington&mdash;Davis&rsquo;s family members&mdash;on August. 8, 2008, names 10 companies that make, label, test, market, or distribute phenytoin.&nbsp; Among other issues, the defendents allege that the defendants misled and failed to adequately warn users of life-threatening side effects caused by taking phenytoin. </p>  <p class="PW">The complaint&rsquo;s causes of action include strict product liability-failure to warn and defect in design or manufacture, fraud, breach of implied and express warranties, negligence and gross negligence.&nbsp; The 10 companies named as defendants are:&nbsp; Mylan Inc., Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis Mid Atlantic, Morton Grove Pharmaceutical Inc., Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., VistaPharm Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., Ivax Pharmaceuticals Inc., Elkins-Sinn Inc., Hospira Inc., Hospria Worldwide Inc., and Baxter Healthcare Corporation.</p>  <p class="PW">The suit also states that Davis began taking phenytoin in June 2006.&nbsp; Sometime later, Davis broke out with a high fever and skin rash that resulted in blisters on her face and body.&nbsp; Davis was then hospitalized for several weeks at the Medical Center of Southeast Texas where she was diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.&nbsp; According to MayoClinic.com, Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a rare, serious disorder of the skin and mucous membranes and often presents with several days of flu-like symptoms, followed by inflammation of the mucous membranes, and a painful red or purplish rash that spreads and blisters, eventually causing the top layer of the skin to die and shed.&nbsp; The syndrome is usually a specific type of allergic reaction in response to medication or infection, according to the Mayo Cinic&rsquo;s Website.</p>  <p class="PW">The plaintiffs allege that the defendants violated the applicable code of federal regulations by failing to include a warning that Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a potential side effect of phenytoin.&nbsp; &quot;Accordingly, Ms. Davis' prescribing physician was deprived of the ability to fully assess the risks when making the decision to prescribe the drugs due to the defendants deficient and inadequate warning,&quot; the complaint states.&nbsp; The plaintiffs also claim that Davis would not have taken phenytoin had the risks and dangers been disclosed, and &quot;would not have suffered her adverse reaction and its subsequent complications.&quot;</p>  <p class="PW">The complaint states that because the drug hazards were hidden, the drug makers &ldquo;have reaped huge profits&quot;; that the defendants failed to perform adequate testing that would have shown that phenytoin possessed serious side effects; that the defendants should have taken appropriate measures to ensure that its defectively designed product would not be placed into the stream of commerce; that prior to manufacturing and distributing the drug, the companies &quot;had knowledge from several sources&quot; that the product presented substantial and unreasonable risks to the consumer; that the drug makers knowingly and deliberately failed to remedy the known defects &quot;for the purpose of increasing sales and enhancing its profits&quot;; and that &ldquo;Defendants' conduct was wanton and willful, and displayed a conscious disregard for the safety of the public and particularly of Ms. Davis, entitling her to exemplary damages.&quot;</p>  <p class="PW">&nbsp;</p>  ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Simvastatin and Amiodarone Linked to Possibly Fatal Muscle Disease</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14911</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The combination of simvastatin and amiodarone, an anti-arrhythmia medication, has been linked to a rare muscle condition that can cause kidney damage and death.&nbsp; The Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) first warned against combining the drugs in 2002 because of their association with the condition - called rhabdomyolysis -&nbsp; but has continued to received reports of its occurrence.Amiodarone is an ingredient in Wyeth's Cordarone and is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The combination of simvastatin and amiodarone, an anti-arrhythmia medication, has been linked to a rare muscle condition that can cause kidney damage and death.&nbsp; The Food &amp; Drug Administration (FDA) first warned against combining the drugs in 2002 because of their association with the condition - called rhabdomyolysis -&nbsp; but has continued to received reports of its occurrence.<br /><br />Amiodarone is an ingredient in Wyeth's Cordarone and is also sold generically. Simvastatin is an ingredient in Merck &amp; Co's Zocor and Abbott Laboratories Inc's Simcor, and is sold generically. It also a component of Merck and Schering-Plough Corp's <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/vytorin">Vytorin</a>.&nbsp; </p><p>Simvastatin is a statin, a class of drugs which already carries a risk of rhabdomyolysis.&nbsp; However, the FDA said today that the risk of developing rhabdomyolysis is more pronounced when simvastatin is combined with amiodarone than it is with other statin medications.<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/rhabdomyolysis"><br /><br />Rhabdomyolysis</a> is a muscle injury that causes the rapid breakdown of skeletal muscle tissue.&nbsp; The destruction of the muscle leads to the release of the breakdown products of damaged muscle cells into the bloodstream; some of these, such as myoglobin, are harmful to the kidney and may lead to acute kidney failure. &nbsp;<br /><br />According to today's <a href="http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/InfoSheets/HCP/simvastatin_amiodaroneHCP.htm">FDA</a> warning, the risk of developing rhabdomyolysis is dose-related and increases when a dose of simvastatin greater than 20 mg per day is given with amiodarone.&nbsp; The agency said that healthcare professionals, who prescribe simvastatin or simvastatin-containing medications (Simcor, Zocor, Vytorin), should be aware that patients taking amiodarone should not take more than 20 mg per day of simvastatin.<br /><br />Patients starting therapy with simvastatin, or who have had their dose of simvastatin increased, should contact their doctor immediately if they&nbsp; experience symptoms of unexplained muscle injury, such as muscle cramps, pain, tenderness, stiffness or spasm.<br /><br />The FDA said it is working with the manufacturer of Cordarone (amiodarone) to modify prescribing information to warn of an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis when amiodarone is taken with simvastatin doses exceeding 20 mg daily. In 2002, the labeling of simvastatin was changed to include similar information.<br /><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Viral Infection at Stony Brook University Medical Center Prompts Hundreds of Warning Letters</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14900</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over 400 patients recently treated at the Stony Brook University Medical Center have received a letter of caution from the hospital's director of quality control.&nbsp; It seems two health care providers who work at the Long Island facility were sickened with a viral illness.A physician, only identified as a medical resident, as well as a nurse both recently came down with a virus named Fifth Disease, which is caused by Human Parvovirus...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Over 400 patients recently treated at the Stony Brook University Medical Center have received a letter of caution from the hospital's director of quality control.&nbsp; It seems two health care providers who work at the Long Island facility were sickened with a <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">viral illness</a>.<br /><br />A physician, only identified as a medical resident, as well as a nurse both recently came down with a virus named Fifth Disease, which is caused by Human Parvovirus B-19.&nbsp; The condition's name originates from being the fifth disease in a line of inevitable childhood rash-producing disorders:&nbsp; Measles, Rubella, Scarlet Fever, and Duke's, which is also referred to as Fourth Disease.<br /><br />Dr. William H. Greene, chief quality officer for the <a href="http://www.stonybrookmedicalcenter.org/">Stony Brook University Medical Center</a>, located in Stony Brook, New York, said 480 letters were sent to affected patients by overnight mail last Friday.&nbsp; Potentially affected patients were those who were in the labor and delivery area of the hospital or in the maternal-fetal clinic in the five-week period between June 26 and July 28.&nbsp; &quot;We're trying to be as cautious and as transparent as possible,&quot; Greene said. &quot;The best medicine is communication and information. That's why we're so proactive in trying to let people know, even though we believe the risk of transmission is low.&quot;<br /><br />Most people catch the infection as children, Greene explained, noting that Human Parvovirus B-19 is contagious prior to the appearance of a &quot;slapped face rash,&quot; characteristic of Fifth Disease and so named because a bright red rash appears that looks as if the patient was slapped.&nbsp; A lacy red rash on the trunk and limbs is also common and sometimes the rashes may itch.&nbsp; Fifth Disease can be accompanied by a low-grade fever, malaise, or the feeling of having a cold a few days prior to the rash, which resolves in about seven to 10 days.&nbsp; While there have been no other reports of illness, it remains unclear how the two workers became infected.<br /><br />The hospital set up a hotline for those patients who received letters to discuss Parvovirus B-19 and Fifth disease with a medical professional.&nbsp; Memos have also been sent to Stony Brook staff members who may have had contact with the two infected providers during the dates.&nbsp; Dr. Jane Seward, deputy director of viral diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), said Fifth Disease is &quot;not a nationally notifiable disease,&rdquo; so the government does not keep official tallies. &quot;It's likely many hundreds of thousands of cases occur every year,&quot; she said, adding that the infection may be asymptomatic and produce no symptoms.&#8232;&#8232;Seward said Human Parvovirus B-19 is not related to the parvoviruses that affect animals.<br /><br />Adults with no immunity can be infected with Human Parvovirus B19 and can have no symptoms or can develop the typical rash of Fifth Disease, as well as joint pain or swelling, or both.&nbsp; Usually, joints on both sides of the body are affected with hand, wrist, and knee joints most affected.&nbsp; Joint pain and swelling usually resolves in a week or two, but can last several months.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Doctor Who Released Cancer Advisory Plans Large Cell Phone Study</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14870</link>		
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Ronald Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers, very recently made headlines by issuing a staff advisory on the potential cancer risks of cell phone use.&nbsp; Now Herberman is looking to create a research project focusing on long-term cell phone users.&nbsp; Last week&rsquo;s announcement represented the first time a U.S. cancer center director issued an advisory to staff and faculty on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dr. Ronald Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers, very recently made headlines by issuing a staff advisory on the potential <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer</a> risks of cell phone use.&nbsp; Now Herberman is looking to create a research project focusing on long-term cell phone users.&nbsp; Last week&rsquo;s announcement represented the first time a U.S. cancer center director issued an advisory to staff and faculty on the potential health risks of cell phone use.<br /><br />Herberman said he is talking with others, including a researcher at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and Dr. Devra Davis, director of the Pitt cancer institute's Center for Environmental Oncology.&nbsp; &quot;We don't want to frighten people.&nbsp; We want them to take precautions,&quot; Davis announced on CNN's &quot;Larry King Live.&quot;&nbsp; Herberman is hoping to secure phone records from cell phone companies or customers so that the research can better identify long-term users who might be at increased risk for health problems, such as brain tumors.&nbsp;&nbsp; Herberman pointed out other studies&rsquo; research tends to rely on user recollections.&nbsp; Herberman plans to seek funding from organizations such as the National Cancer Institute, once a proposal is developed.<br /><br />&ldquo;Recently I have become aware of the growing body of literature linking long-term cell phone use to possible adverse health effects including cancer,&quot; Herberman wrote in the memo. &quot;Although the evidence is still controversial, I am convinced that there are sufficient data to warrant issuing an advisory to share some precautionary advice on cell phone use.&rdquo;&nbsp; The memo provided suggestions to limit exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones, such as shortening the length of conversations and distancing cell phones from one&rsquo;s head by text messaging or using headsets or speakerphones; he recommended children not use cell phones except in emergencies.<br /><br />Herberman acknowledged some colleagues questioned the scientific basis for linking cell phone use with cancer risk and some leading groups also remain unconvinced.&nbsp; For instance, the American Cancer Society says there is no firm evidence linking cell phone use to brain cancer.&nbsp; But, Herberman said studies brought to his attention as well as precautions issues on cell phone use by other countries and Toronto public health officials, prompted his actions.&nbsp; With Davis, Herberman drafted the advisory that was then released to about 3,000 personnel at the institute and the cancer centers.&nbsp; The two revised and issued portions of a document, endorsed by them and other members of an international expert panel, which urged precautions.<br /><br />Herberman said he had no financial incentive and objected to suggestions in some of the news coverage, particularly a widely circulated Associated Press story, that he based his concerns on unpublished data.&nbsp; &quot;My own take on all the available reports is that they suggest a problem to be concerned about,&quot; he said. Simple precautions, he added, would be &quot;prudent to adopt in order to reduce potential risk.&quot;<br /><br />Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News, which tracks research related to cell phone safety, said Herberman's advisory was important because study information is often slow in coming and the issue is further complicated because cell phone technology continues to evolve.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Tobacco Company-Funded Lung Cancer Study Corrected AGAIN!</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14864</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New England Journal of Medicine just published an unbelievable third correction to a controversial medical study on the advisability of lung cancer screening.&nbsp; Although the study has long been in question over its ties to the tobacco industry, this third correction only serves to further weaken the study's findings.In March we reported that in late 2006, Dr. Claudia Henschke of Weill Cornell Medical College released a study revealing...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The New England Journal of Medicine just published an unbelievable third correction to a controversial medical study on the advisability of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">lung cancer</a> screening.&nbsp; Although the study has long been in question over its ties to the tobacco industry, this third correction only serves to further weaken the study's findings.<br /><br />In March we reported that in late 2006, Dr. Claudia Henschke of Weill Cornell Medical College released a study revealing that the majority&mdash;80 percent&mdash;of lung cancer deaths could be prevented through widespread use of CT scans.&nbsp; The study was published in The New England Journal of Medicine and indicated&mdash;in small print at the end of the piece&mdash;that the work was financed, in part, by the Foundation for Lung Cancer:&nbsp; Early Detection, Prevention &amp; Treatment.&nbsp; A tax record review later revealed the foundation was almost entirely underwritten by $3.6 million in grants from the parent company of the Liggett Group&mdash;the Vector Group&mdash;maker of Liggett Select, Eve, Grand Prix, Quest, and Pyramid cigarette brands.&nbsp; From 2000 to 2003, the foundation received four grants from Vector.<br /><br />Regular cancer screening is not common for lung cancer as it is in colon and breast cancers, despite that lung cancer is the largest cancer killer.&nbsp; Also, no study thus far has clearly proven lung cancer screening would reduce its death rate.&nbsp; Henschke&rsquo;s 2006 study is the leading study to favor such screening.&nbsp; In that study, researchers scanned over 30,000 patients with a computed tomography machine and found first-stage cancers in 407 and, among those in whom cancer was detected, the majority underwent surgery to remove their cancers within a month, experiencing a 92 percent chance of surviving for 10 years.&nbsp; Allegedly.<br /><br />The study lacked a comparison group, so interpretation was difficult.&nbsp; Also difficult was determining if those patients would have lived for 10 years without screening and surgery.&nbsp; And, based on other patients&rsquo; records, estimates have ranged widely&mdash;between 50 or 70 percent.&nbsp; Meanwhile, the study noted that in a group of eight patients found to have first-stage cancer but who did not receive surgery, all eight died within five years.&nbsp; Henschke has quoted the eight-patient figure in several follow-up articles discussing and defending the study.<br /><br />The data was wrong.&nbsp; Henschke wrote in a letter that the Journal just released on its Web site that not eight, but three patients, were in the group, rendering the comparison significantly less reliable.&nbsp; Henschke's also disclosed that one of the hospitals participating in the study did not follow the study's protocol, causing the need for a variety of other data adjustments.&nbsp; The letter is the third correction the Journal has published to the study.&nbsp; Previously, Henschke and a colleague acknowledged they received undisclosed royalties related to screening machines and that the study was partly funded by tobacco giant Vector Group Ltd.<br /><br />In March, Dr. Jeffrey M. Drazen, the Journal&rsquo;s editor-in-chief expressed surprise at the study&rsquo;s funding, &ldquo;In the seven years that I&rsquo;ve been here, we have never knowingly published anything supported by&rdquo; a cigarette maker.&nbsp; Prominent cancer researchers and journal editors were also stunned to learn of the study&rsquo;s tobacco link.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Warning Issued by Cancer Center Head</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14813</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of one of the country's top cancer centers has warned his staff that cell phones could be dangerous to their health.&nbsp; Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, the director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers, issued an internal advisory memo to about 3,000 faculty and staff members advising them to take precautions to avoid the possible cancer risks of cell phones.Scientists and the federal government have been...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The head of one of the country's top cancer centers has warned his staff that cell phones could be dangerous to their health.&nbsp; Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, the director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and UPMC Cancer Centers, issued an internal advisory memo to about 3,000 faculty and staff members advising them to take precautions to avoid the possible <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer</a> risks of cell phones.<br /><br />Scientists and the federal government have been studying the effects of radiation for years and have established guidelines with the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">Federal Communications Commission</a> (FCC) to limit the amount of exposure.&nbsp; Cell phones emit radiofrequency energy, a type of radiation that is a form of electromagnetic radiation, according to the National Cancer Institute. Though studies are being done to see if there is a link between it and tumors of the brain and central nervous system, and so far, findings have been inconclusive.<br /><br />Herberman says it takes too long to get answers from science and he believes people should take action now &mdash; especially when it comes to children.&nbsp; His memo cites a &quot;growing body of literature linking long-term cell phone use to possible adverse health effects including cancer.&quot; &nbsp;<br /><br />&quot;Although the evidence is still controversial, I am convinced that there are sufficient data to warrant issuing an advisory to share some precautionary advice on cell phone use,&quot; Herberman wrote.<br /><br />Herberman points to a massive ongoing research project known as Interphone, involving scientists in 13 nations, mostly in Europe. Results already published in peer-reviewed journals from this project aren't so alarming, but Herberman's memo was referring to work not yet published.<br /><br />Herberman's memo advises that children - whose brains are still developing - only use cell phones in emergencies.&nbsp; Adults should keep the phone away from the head and use the speakerphone or a wireless headset, he says. He even warns against using cell phones in public places like a bus because it exposes others to the phone's electromagnetic fields. <br /><br />In an interview with &quot;The Pittsburgh Post Gazette&quot;,&nbsp; Herberman noted that other countries have recommended limits on exposure, and that in Canada, officials in Toronto have advised young people to limit cell phone use. Herberman said he believes he is the first cancer center director to approve the release of such an advisory, and the National Cancer Institute said it knew of no similar advisory issued by a U.S. cancer center director.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>After 2 Years, NSF Sufferer Wins Fight with Insurer</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14772</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Tennesee woman with Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) has won a battle with her insurance company.&nbsp; After two years of litigation, a judge has ordered TennCare to pay for a treatment that might save her life.&nbsp; TennCare is Tennessee&rsquo;s Medicaid managed care program that provides health coverage for low-income children, pregnant women and disabled Tennesseans. TennCare had previously refused to cover the treatment - known as...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A Tennesee woman with <a href="http://nsf-talk.com/">Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis</a> (NSF) has won a battle with her insurance company.&nbsp; After two years of litigation, a judge has ordered TennCare to pay for a treatment that might save her life.&nbsp; TennCare is Tennessee&rsquo;s Medicaid managed care program that provides health coverage for low-income children, pregnant women and disabled Tennesseans. TennCare had previously refused to cover the treatment - known as extracorporeal photopheresis - for Jeanie Deason because it was considered experimental.<br /><br />NSF is a devastating condition that affects people with pre-existing kidney problems who have been exposed to <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/gadolinium">gadolinium contrast dyes</a> that are used&nbsp; in MRI procedures. There is currently no cure for NSF and no one understands its specific cause. The disorder is characterized&nbsp; by high blood pressure, burning, itching, swelling and hardening of the skin. Other symptoms include red or dark patches on the skin; pain deep in the hip bones or ribs and muscle weakness. NSF can progress to the point of causing severe stiffness in joints, and it can lead to death. <br /><br />The evidence that gadolinium contrast agents play a role in the development of NSF is fast becoming irrefutable. Dutch scientists made the first connection between NSF and gadolinium in 2006. Since then, researchers at Yale University have reported that 95-percent of those with NSF had undergone a Magnetic Imaging Resonance (MRI) procedure that involved a gadolinium contrast dye two to three months before their symptoms appeared. Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital also have found that kidney patients who had undergone MRIs with gadolinium&nbsp; contrast dyes were 10 times more likely to develop NSF than patient who had not been exposed to such agents.<br /><br />In 2007, the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/Cder/Drug/infopage/gcca/default.htm">Food &amp; Drug Administration</a> (FDA) asked the manufacturers of gadolinium contrast dyes to add a black box warning to the product labels about its association with NSF. The FDA also warned that patients with kidney disease should avoid gadolinium contrast agents.<br /><br />Deason's NSF has progressed to the point where her legs and right arm have become frozen in a bent position.&nbsp; During the fight with TennCare her condition deteriorated to the point where she needs someone&nbsp; to stay with her 24 hours a day.&nbsp; Now she spends her days in bed, limbs throbbing, only getting up when her parents help her go to the bathroom.&nbsp; She even had to miss her daughter's graduation.<br /><br />The treatment that Deason hopes will restore some normalcy to her life is called extracorporeal photopheresis.&nbsp; It involves removing blood from a patient's body, exposing it to ultraviolet light and then re-infusing the blood into the body. It's believed that the treated blood alters the body's immune system so it can better fight the disease. It can cost around $8000 for one treatment.<br /><br />Deason's physician, Dr. John Zic, an assistant professor of dermatology at Vanderbilt University who has treated four patients in this way, told the Tennessean he has seen dramatic results.&nbsp; One patient who was initially unable to close her hand could use a pen to sign documents after three months of treatment. Another patient had significant joint stiffness and difficulty walking. After about seven months, the patient was walking without a significant limp. In all, three of Zic's patients improved and one died because of issues with dialysis treatment, not because the treatment was ineffective<br /><br />But despite the hope it holds for Deason, TennCare refused to pay or the treatment because it was experimental.&nbsp;&nbsp; Deason was forced to take the insurer to court, and in April, a judge in Davidson County Chancery Court overruled TennCare's decision, saying even though it's experimental it's medically necessary.&nbsp; Recently, TennCare indicated it would not fight the judge's ruling.<br /><br />While Deason is pleased with the decision, she hopes it has not come too late.&nbsp; She hopes the treatment will eventually walk again, but she also knows her chances would have been better if she had started it two years ago.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>CA-MRSA Striking Children with Bone Infections</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14685</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It began with the staph bacteria&mdash;Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;and moved to the drug resistant MRSA&mdash;Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.&nbsp; Recently, there has been a rapid emergence of CA-MRSA&mdash;Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;with the germ moving out of its traditional environment of hospitals and healthcare facilities and into the general population.&nbsp; Now, CA-MRSA is attacking...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It began with the staph bacteria&mdash;Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;and moved to the drug resistant <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a>&mdash;Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.&nbsp; Recently, there has been a rapid emergence of CA-MRSA&mdash;Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;with the germ moving out of its traditional environment of hospitals and healthcare facilities and into the general population.&nbsp; Now, CA-MRSA is attacking children and is leading to increased complications and longer hospital stays for children with acute bone infections, or acute osteomyelitis, according to UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers report.<br /><br />Acute osteomyelitis is typically found in children and caused by staph. Because treatment of staph was generally treated with basic antibiotic therapy, osteomyelities treatment was pretty basic.&nbsp; Now that the deadlier CA-MRSA is gaining ground, children with Staphylococcus aureus seem to be developing the more severe, deadlier, antibiotic-resistant, CA-MRSA.&nbsp; &quot;This study shows the transition from the normal S. aureus to the methicillin-resistant one that everybody calls the superbug,&quot; said Dr. Octavio Ramilo, professor of pediatrics at UT Southwestern and senior author of a study available online and in the July/August issue of the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics.&nbsp; &quot;What's important about this is not only that MRSA infections are harder to treat because they are more resistant to the traditional antibiotics, but they are also more aggressive and cause more severe disease manifestations.&nbsp; This is reflected very clearly in this study.&quot;<br /><br />Dr. Asunci&oacute;n Mej&iacute;as, assistant professor of pediatrics and co-lead author, said &ldquo;The MRSA that we used to see was acquired in the hospital.&nbsp; This is a different strain that patients acquire in the community.&nbsp; Now, we see kids with osteomyelitis who have bone abscesses in the legs and who get blood clots that lead to pulmonary embolisms.&nbsp; We don't want to alarm parents, but kids who limp or have backaches and fever after an otherwise minor trauma need to be evaluated by a physician.&quot;&nbsp; Ramilo explained that osteomyelitis might be more common in children because they tend to be more accident-prone.&nbsp; Typically, bones get infected when bacteria reach the bone through the blood; minor bone trauma likely facilitates the infection.<br /><br />Researchers reviewed the medical records of 290 children admitted to Children's Medical Center Dallas between January 1999-December 2003 with acute osteomyelitis. The median age was six.&nbsp; Patients were divided into two groups&mdash;January 1999-June 2001 and July 2001-December 2003&mdash;to determine if MRSA infections were becoming more common and more severe over time.&nbsp; Patients with MRSA osteomyelitis were compared to non-MRSA osteomyelitis patients, which included methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) infections.&nbsp; The study revealed that children treated in the latter period fared far worse, Dr. Ramilo said.&nbsp; In those children, bone abscesses were observed in 69 percent of the patients with MRSA osteomyelitis versus 26 percent among those with MSSA infections. Children admitted with MRSA osteomyelitis during the second study period spent an average of 42 days on antibiotics, almost two weeks longer than those diagnosed with MSSA.&nbsp; Dr. Ramilo said the number of children requiring surgery was significant at 78 percent in the MRSA group versus 49 percent with MSSA.<br /><br />Center of Disease Control (CDC) estimates place last year&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000, with 2,000 healthy people dying from CA-MRSA.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Cell Phone Cancer Risks Need Further Study</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14672</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have still not been able to say whether or not cell phone use increases the chances of developing cancer or health problems.&nbsp; The uncertainty over the health effects of cell phone use has created a great deal of controversy, and has left both consumers and medical professionals confused over the possible hazards of these now ubiquitous devices.Earlier this year, an Australian neurosurgeon published a paper on the Internet saying...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Scientists have still not been able to say whether or not cell phone use increases the chances of developing <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/practice_areas/diseases">cancer</a> or health problems.&nbsp; The uncertainty over the health effects of cell phone use has created a great deal of controversy, and has left both consumers and medical professionals confused over the possible hazards of these now ubiquitous devices.<br /><br />Earlier this year, an Australian neurosurgeon published a paper on the Internet saying cell phone use &quot;has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking.&quot;&nbsp; The doctor, Vini Khurana, analyzed data from more than 100 studies, and concluded that most weren't long enough to uncover a risk of brain cancer and that children haven't been adequately studied<br /><br />Many health officials took Dr. Khurana to task for his alarming stance, but he is not alone in his concerns.&nbsp; In January, the <a href="http://www.nasonline.org/site/PageServer">National Academy of Sciences</a> released a report calling for more research on cell phones and health risks. The authors concluded that many of the past studies were not conducted over a long-enough period of time to assess the risk of brain cancer.<br /><br />A few small studies have indicated a link between cell phones and some types of tumors.&nbsp; For instance, earlier this year, a study conducted by researchers at&nbsp; Tel Aviv University&nbsp; found a link between prolonged cell phone use and cancer.&nbsp; According to the study, people who use cell phones for lengthy periods of time every day were 50 percent more likely to develop both benign or malignant tumors in their parotid gland, the main saliva-producing gland that is located between the jaw and ear.<br /><br />But two studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute have found conflicting results.&nbsp; According to a recent article in the LA Times, several studies coordinated through the International Agency for Research on Cancer, called the Interphone studies, have&nbsp; failed to show an association between cell phones and cancer. Numerous laboratory studies on animals have also found no evidence that DNA is damaged by low levels of radio frequency.<br /><br />The high volume of people who regularly use cell phones,&nbsp; together with a few studies, like the one done in Tel Aviv, that have found a potential link between brain cancer and cell phones, indicates a need for further research.&nbsp; Few studies have also been conducted on the effects of cell phone use in children.&nbsp; So far, the focus of much cell phone research has been on brain tumors, and other health outcomes - such as behavioral problems and central nervous system damage - has been ignored.<br /><br />One recent study did suggest that the children of mothers who use cell phones while pregnant are more likely to develop behavioral problems.&nbsp; The study, conducted by University of California in Los Angeles (UCLA) and the University of Aarhus in Denmark, looked at more than 13,000 children in Denmark born at the end of the 1990s.&nbsp; he research indicated that pregnant women who did use cell phones were 54 percent more likely to have children with behavioral problems.&nbsp; If the children later used cell phones themselves, the figure rose to 89 percent.<br /><br />These conflicting studies mean the cell phone - health effects controversy won't be going away anytime soon.&nbsp; Many experts have suggested that cell phone uses - especially those who rely heavily on the devices - use hands free technology to try to limit whatever health risks they may pose.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>MRSA Increasing Among Athletes</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14660</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&rsquo;ve long reported on the escalating issues with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, commonly referred to as MRSA and now, CA-MRSA, or community-associated MRSA.&nbsp; MRSA is a type of staph that causes infections resistant to most antibiotics and last year, seriously sickened 94,000 Americans.&nbsp; Recent deaths include five school children with school infections in the dozens.&nbsp; MRSA also infected players from four NFL...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[We&rsquo;ve long reported on the escalating issues with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, commonly referred to as <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a> and now, CA-MRSA, or community-associated MRSA.&nbsp; MRSA is a type of staph that causes infections resistant to most antibiotics and last year, seriously sickened 94,000 Americans.&nbsp; Recent deaths include five school children with school infections in the dozens.&nbsp; MRSA also infected players from four NFL teams, some NYC firefighters, and seems to strike people in close physical contact.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/">Centers for Disease Control</a> (CDC) estimates place last year&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000, with 2,000 healthy people dying from CA-MRSA.<br /><br />MRSA was associated with extended hospital stays, but now, CA-MRSA is striking healthy individuals, raising fears it can strike anyone, anywhere, anytime.&nbsp; The Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology reported last year that nearly five percent of U.S. patients were infected or colonized with MRSA.&nbsp; MRSA is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort when not treated properly.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this drug is being used more and more and with decreasing success.&nbsp; Without treatment or with incorrect diagnosis and treatment, MRSA spreads rapidly, leading to respiratory failure and surgeries, attacking vital organs like the lungs and heart.&nbsp; Survivors are not always returned to their pre-MRSA condition, losing limbs, hearing, and full use of damaged organs.<br /><br />Dermatologists report MRSA infections have become increasingly common among athletes, including high school and college athletes.&nbsp; In the report entitled, &ldquo;Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and athletes,&rdquo; published online in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, dermatologist Brian B. Adams, MD, MPH, FAAD, associate professor of dermatology at the University of Cincinnati and director of dermatology at the Veterans Administration Medical Center, in Cincinnati, said, &ldquo;Our review found that physical contact, shared facilities and equipment, and poor hygiene all contribute to MRSA among athletes.&rdquo;<br /><br />The biggest culprit is football, but rugby and wrestling are also high-risk sports.&nbsp; One study conducted on the St. Louis Rams found nine percent of the players had MRSA.&nbsp; Adams pointed out that players affected tended toward higher body mass indices and played lineman or linebacker positions.&nbsp; &ldquo;Considering all factors &hellip; frequent antibiotic use, compromised skin barriers, skin contact between players, close proximity of teammates, and inadequate hand and personal hygiene &hellip; may have contributed to the team&rsquo;s MRSA outbreak &hellip; infections found in players from an opposing team suggested that transmission may have occurred during play,&rdquo; said Adams.<br /><br />Studies of high school and college football players revealed shared facilities were responsible for MRSA.&nbsp; One high school dance member developed MRSA and the only link to the football team was use of a shared room.&nbsp; Adams referred to a United Kingdom study involving a rugby team that concluded &ldquo;that the outbreak probably resulted from sustained physical contact rather than from transmission through shared facilities or equipment.&rdquo;&nbsp; Studies show that wrestlers, who often engage in prolonged physical contact and experience frequent mat burns, may be prone to MRSA, with some studies indicating that transmission &ldquo;may have occurred through the use of shared items instead of personal contact &hellip; even in largely non-contact sports &hellip; outbreaks of MRSA infections have been reported&ndash;suggesting that shared facilities or shared personal items were the likely culprit,&rdquo; said Adams.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>MRSA Thrives in Overcrowded Hospitals</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14642</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Austrian researchers reported Monday what many have long suspected:&nbsp; Overcrowded hospitals that quickly push patients home may be helping in the spread of deadly, drug-resistant germs.&nbsp; According to the researchers, who reviewed several studies on the issue, hospitals filled to capacity are likelier to have outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other infections.Dr. Michael Whitby of Princess Alexandra...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Austrian researchers reported Monday what many have long suspected:&nbsp; Overcrowded hospitals that quickly push patients home may be helping in the spread of deadly, drug-resistant germs.&nbsp; According to the researchers, who reviewed several studies on the issue, hospitals filled to capacity are likelier to have outbreaks of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)</a> and other infections.<br /><br />Dr. Michael Whitby of Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane and colleagues reported that this problem will continue and will only worsen as populations grow and people live longer.&nbsp; &ldquo;The drive towards greater efficiency by reducing the number of hospital beds and increasing patient throughput has led to highly stressed health-care systems with unwelcome side-effects,&rdquo; they wrote in the Lancet Infectious Diseases.<br /><br />Also, numerous studies reveal that doctors, nurses, and other health care workers neither wash their hands as well nor as frequently as recommended.&nbsp; This under and insufficient washing only worsens when hospitals experience understaffing and high workloads.&nbsp; Overcrowded hospitals also face challenges in isolating patients with MRSA and other dangerous infections.<br /><br />The study found that in Australia, the number of public hospital beds per person fell by 40 percent between 1982 and 2000, while 14 percent more patients were treated.&nbsp; In other developed countries&mdash;Great Britain, the United States, Canada&mdash;similar trends were seen according to the researchers who added that hospitals tend to treat patients in one day as opposed to treating them as inpatients.&nbsp; &ldquo;Workforce aging is also a problem&mdash;in the (United States), average-age of nurses has increased from 37.4 years in 1983 to 46.8 years in 2004,&rdquo; they wrote.<br /><br />Last year alone, 94,000 Americans fell seriously ill after developing MRSA with most infected in healthcare facilities.&nbsp; Previously limited to hospital and nursing home patients, MRSA is now spreading and killing in communities.&nbsp; Recent deaths have included five school children and infections in schools are now in the dozens.&nbsp; MRSA also infected players from four NFL teams, some NYC firefighters, and seems to strike people who are in close physical contact.&nbsp; Center of Disease Control (CDC) estimates place last year&rsquo;s MRSA death toll at 19,000 Americans, with 2,000 of these people&mdash;healthy people&mdash;contracting community-based MRSA.<br /><br />MRSA infections can range from boils to more severe infections of the bloodstream, lungs and surgical sites and is spread by the hands and on contaminated medical equipment.&nbsp; The Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology reported last year that nearly five percent of U.S. patients were infected or colonized with MRSA.<br /><br />MRSA is resistant to all but the one antibiotic of last resort when not treated properly.&nbsp; Formerly used in the most potent cases, this drug is being used more and more and, as a result, MRSA is developing resistance to this last successful medication.&nbsp; And while new MRSA drugs are emerging, it&rsquo;s just a matter of time before the superbug will become resistant to them, too.&nbsp; Without treatment or with incorrect diagnosis and treatment, the MRSA infection spreads rapidly and can lead to respiratory failure and surgeries, attacking vital organs like the lungs and heart.&nbsp; Survivors are not always returned to their pre-MRSA condition, losing limbs, hearing, and full use of damaged organs.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>MRSA Fight Hindered by Lack of Hand Washing in Hospitals</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14605</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MRSA is a deadly, mutated form of staph infection that has become resistant to most antibiotic forms of treatment and is rapidly spreading into the general public.&nbsp; Stopping the spread of methicillan-resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;MRSA&mdash;has been a challenge that has all but consumed the nation&rsquo;s healthcare system.&nbsp; Once seen chiefly in hospitals, MRSA is now striking healthy people outside of hospitals and nursing...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a> is a deadly, mutated form of staph infection that has become resistant to most antibiotic forms of treatment and is rapidly spreading into the general public.&nbsp; Stopping the spread of methicillan-resistant Staphylococcus aureus&mdash;MRSA&mdash;has been a challenge that has all but consumed the nation&rsquo;s healthcare system.&nbsp; Once seen chiefly in hospitals, MRSA is now striking healthy people outside of hospitals and nursing homes and has emerged as a community-based&mdash;as opposed to hospital-derived&mdash;disease.&nbsp; Among community-based patients, over 20 percent were dead within one year, according to research conducted at McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.<br /><br />Over 2,000 infection experts who responded to an MRSA survey conducted by the <a href="http://www.apic.org//AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home1">Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology</a> (APIC) recently met at a national conference to discuss MRSA; the APIC was the first to notice the prevalence of MRSA was at least eight times higher than previously estimated.&nbsp; One of the specific issues discussed was how to reduce MRSA when colleagues are unwilling to wash their hands.&nbsp; &ldquo;They&rsquo;ll know somebody is watching and they still won&rsquo;t wash!&rdquo; said Kathy Bryant, a registered nurse and infection control director at Spartanburg Regional Hospital in Spartanburg, South Carolina.<br /><br />The majority of respondents reported that their hospitals and health care centers have done more educate and enhance procedures; however, over half said that facilities are not taking sufficient measures to reduce MRSA risks.&nbsp; The infection experts&mdash;Infection Preventionists&mdash;said more effort is called for to address basic germ prevention precautions such as adequate hand hygiene among first-line professionals such as doctors, nurses, and other health workers as well as steps to ensure a sanitary environment.&nbsp; &ldquo;It&rsquo;s the areas where they have the greatest issues in compliance,&rdquo; said Kathy Warye, APIC&rsquo;s chief executive officer. &ldquo;It needs to become a routine part of care instead of an interruption in care.&rdquo;<br /><br />Shockingly, a variety of studies confirm under half of all US health workers wash as often required, a point of frustration among the over 4,000 conference attendees.&nbsp; &ldquo;It doesn&rsquo;t matter if it&rsquo;s God himself or the governor or whoever, you have to wash up,&rdquo; said Rebecca Peters, an infection control staffer at York Hospital in York, Pennsylvania.<br /><br />The infection preventionists confirmed they experience resistance when trying to implement infection control standards and point to a number of issues such as too little time, too many patients, inconvenience, and low paid staffers not understanding or implementing appropriate and consistent procedures.&nbsp; Bryant added that her fire marshal limited the number and placement of hand sanitizer dispensers over fears the alcohol-based gel could be a fire hazard, a move that adversely impacted infection control measures.<br /><br />According to Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) figures for 2005, nearly 19,000 people died in the US from MRSA; an additional 94,000 were seriously sickened.&nbsp; Of the 19,000 patients studied in 2005, 2,000 were healthy people contracting community-based MRSA.&nbsp; In Canada, about 220,000 people are sickened and an additional 8,000-12,000 die annually.&nbsp; Patients surviving MRSA often require amputations to cure infections.&nbsp; MRSA has infected players from four NFL teams, some NYC firefighters, and has infected or killed a growing number of school children.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Family of Girl Blinded by Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Sues Maker of Children's Motrin</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14584</link>		
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The family of a young girl blinded as a result of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome blames Children's Motrin for her injuries, and has taken the maker of the over-the-counter pain reliever to court.&nbsp; The family's lawsuit is seeking better labeling for the pain reliever, as well as compensatory and punitive damages from McNeil PPC, and its parent, Johnson &amp;&nbsp; Johnson. &nbsp;Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a sometimes life-threatening...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The family of a young girl blinded as a result of <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/stevens_johnson_syndrome">Stevens-Johnson Syndrome</a> blames Children's Motrin for her injuries, and has taken the maker of the over-the-counter pain reliever to court.&nbsp; The family's lawsuit is seeking better labeling for the pain reliever, as well as compensatory and punitive damages from McNeil PPC, and its parent, Johnson &amp;&nbsp; Johnson. &nbsp;<br /><br />Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is a sometimes life-threatening hypersensitivity complex affecting the skin and the mucous membrane that may be caused by many drugs, viral infections, and malignancies. Steven-Johnson Syndrome is characterized by blistering of mucous membranes, typically in the mouth, eyes, and vagina, and patchy areas of rash. It can cause the top layer of the skin to separate from the lower layer of the skin in affected areas.&nbsp; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome is fatal in about 5 percent of all cases.<br /><br />Because it involves the mucus membrane, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome usually requires treatment in a hospital burn unit.&nbsp; A recent New York study linked ibuprofen to nearly half of the 32 children referred to a local burn unit over an eight-year period.<br /><br />The parents of Sabrina Johnson, who was six at the time of her diagnosis, said she was given two doses - one in the afternoon and another later in the evening - of Children's Motrin one day in 2003 to alleviate symptoms of a fever.&nbsp; According to the lawsuit, Sabrina awoke the next morning with a high fever, her eyes were pink, and her mouth was swollen and covered in sores.&nbsp; Sabrina was immediately hospitalized, but by the next day, she was blind in both eyes. Doctors then diagnosed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.<br /><br />Sabrina's lawyer alleges that Johnson &amp; Johnson knew of a link between ibuprofen, the active ingredient in Motrin, and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The lawsuit points out that while the prescription version of the drug has stronger warnings, the over-the-counter version mentions nothing about this risk.<br /><br />Jury selection for Sabrina's lawsuit, which is being heard in Los Angeles Superior Court, began last week. Arguments are expected to begin&nbsp; this&nbsp; week.&nbsp; Sabrina's Stevens-Johnson Syndrome lawsuit is the first of nine similar lawsuits scheduled to begin this year and next in the US.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>CDC Warning of Dangerous, MRSA-Related Pneumonia in Kids</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14518</link>		
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Staph&mdash;a germ that generally comes in the form of pimples or rashes that heal on their own&mdash;has caused fatal pneumonia in at least 24 young and healthy people during the 2006-2007 flu season.&nbsp; US researchers&mdash;led by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warn that doctors need to be on the alert for a drug-resistant form of staph called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA that leads to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[  <p class="PW">Staph&mdash;a germ that generally comes in the form of pimples or rashes that heal on their own&mdash;has caused fatal pneumonia in at least 24 young and healthy people during the 2006-2007 flu season.&nbsp; US researchers&mdash;led by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warn that doctors need to be on the alert for a drug-resistant form of staph called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a> that leads to life-threatening pneumonia.</p>  <p class="PW">Dr. Alexander Kallen of the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/ar_mrsa.html">CDC</a> led the study and confirmed that some patients died within four days and many were not initially treated for MRSA, suggesting their doctors did not know that they were dealing with MRSA-provoked pneumonia. &quot;It's obviously very concerning,&quot; Kallen said. &quot;This is a disease that can strike otherwise very healthy people&mdash;adults and children.&nbsp; Also, this is a disease that follows influenza.&quot;&nbsp; Kallen also indicated that the disease has implications for preparing for the flu season and a possible flu pandemic.</p>  <p class="PW">Kallen&rsquo;s team reviewed reports of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Staph aureus between November 1, 2006 and April 30, 2007 and found that, &quot;Overall, 51 cases were reported from 19 states.&quot;&nbsp; Their findings appear in the <em>Annals of Emergency Medicine</em>.&nbsp; &quot;More than three-quarters&mdash;79 percent&mdash;of the staph-caused pneumonia patients were infected with MRSA,&quot; Kallen said.</p>  <p class="PW">The patients&rsquo; average age was 16.&nbsp; One-third had confirmed influenza; however, nearly half&mdash;40 percent&mdash;were healthy.&nbsp; According to the researchers, 24 patients died within an average of four days following a pneumonia diagnosis. Those infected with the flu were about twice as likely to die from the staph-caused pneumonia.&nbsp; &quot;The key message to realize is that during the winter season, especially when influenza is circulating, physicians need to be thinking about this as a cause.&quot;</p>  <p class="PW">Staph aureus is common and generally about 30 percent of all people are colonized with staph at any given time.&nbsp; This means that these people have the staph bacteria living on their skin or in their noses, but are not ill.&nbsp; &quot;You shake hands with someone and you get MRSA and MRSA colonizes you,&quot; Kallen said.</p>  <p class="PW">Staph can get into the lungs and cause disease and some studies indicate that when people are infected with flu, the virus can help shut down the natural processes for ensuring the lungs clear, thus allowing the staph bacteria to grow in the lungs.</p>  <p class="PW">In April we reported a disturbing increase in the number of children dying from both the flu and MRSA.&nbsp; At that time, state and federal disease investigators began tracking the situation and Massachusetts&rsquo;s health authorities linked two childhood flu deaths to MRSA and found that nationally, of 74 children known to have died from the flu in the US in 2006-07, 22 also had staph, most MRSA.&nbsp; The CDC expressed deep concern and began planning on executing a monitoring network for patients co-infected with flu and MRSA during the next flu season.&nbsp; Experts say that data and other findings could assist doctors in preventing flu-MRSA cases from turning fatal.</p>  ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>Antibacterial Wipes May Be Spreading Super Bugs in Hospitals</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14514</link>		
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, disinfecting wipes and alcohol-based hand gels are widely used in hospitals, schools, and other public settings to kill the germs that cause infectious disease.&nbsp; And, it is estimated that Americans spend a staggering $1 billion annually on these and other antibacterial products; however, with the rise in deadly antibiotic-resistant superbugs, their direct impact on the spread of infectious disease is not clearly understood.In a study...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Today, disinfecting wipes and alcohol-based hand gels are widely used in hospitals, schools, and other public settings to kill the germs that cause infectious disease.&nbsp; And, it is estimated that Americans spend a staggering $1 billion annually on these and other antibacterial products; however, with the rise in deadly antibiotic-resistant superbugs, their direct impact on the spread of infectious disease is not clearly understood.<br /><br />In a study that focused only on the wipes, researchers found that instead of preventing hospital-acquired infections like the mutated form of staph infection called methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the wipes could actually be spreading bacteria when used improperly by hospital staffers.<br /><br />About 100,000 cases of invasive <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/mrsa_infections">MRSA</a> occur annually in the United States according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and, shockingly, most of these infections occur in hospitals and other health-care settings.&nbsp; According to research earlier this year conducted at McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada, over 20 percent of its MRSA patients were dead within one year.&nbsp; MRSA, is now considered even more dangerous than previously believed and, once seen chiefly in hospitals, MRSA is now striking healthy people outside of hospitals and nursing homes and has emerged as a community-based&mdash;as opposed to hospital-derived&mdash;disease.<br /><br />Disinfectant wipes are among the most common products used in such healthcare facilities in the prevention of the spread of MRSA and other infectious pathogens.&nbsp; In a study presented today in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, researchers from Cardiff University's Welsh School of Pharmacy reported that when used improperly, antibacterial wipes may spread bacteria rather than remove or kill them.&nbsp; Researchers Jean-Yves Maillard, PhD, Gareth Williams, PhD, and colleagues observed hospital staffers using the wipes to disinfect hospital rooms.&nbsp; &quot;We saw that there was a tendency to use one wipe on consecutive surfaces, such as bed rails, computer monitors, and keyboards,&quot; Williams said.<br /><br />The researchers used the wipes in this way in laboratory tests designed to measure their ability to remove and kill the bacteria that cause staph infections, including MRSA.&nbsp; While most wipes tested did remove large numbers of bacteria from contaminated surfaces, they also transferred live bacteria to uncontaminated surfaces when used in more than one place.&nbsp; Some wipes that claimed to kill bacteria were found to transfer live bacteria from one surface to another, the researchers report.&nbsp; &quot;The message is that they have to be used properly,&quot; Williams says.&nbsp; That means using one swipe per wipe on a single surface, Maillard adds.<br /><br />According to 2005 CDC figures, nearly 19,000 people died in the U.S. from MRSA infections; 94,000 were seriously sickened.&nbsp; Of 19,000 patients studied in 2005, 2,000 were healthy people contracting community-based MRSA.&nbsp; In Canada, about 220,000 people are sickened; an additional 8,000 to 12,000 die annually.&nbsp; Also, well-known but not widely publicized, patients surviving MRSA often require amputations to cure infections.&nbsp; &quot;Our study suggests that MRSA can be a potentially serious infection in the community leading to increased mortality,&quot; the investigators concluded, adding that the &quot;judicious use of antibiotics is essential to prevent these quite deadly community-acquired MRSA infections,&quot; given the emergence of antibiotic resistance when antibiotics are used indiscriminately.<br /><br />]]></content:encoded>
	</item>	
	
	<item>
		<title>E. Coli, Staph Infections Possible Culprits in SIDS</title>
		<link>http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14501</link>		
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourlawyer.com/articles/read/14501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sudden Infant Death Syndrome&mdash;SIDS&mdash;has long baffled the medical community and is one of the leading causes of death in children under the age of one.&nbsp; Now, British researchers say they may have found that bacteria is a contributing factor in SIDS and say that potentially dangerous bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli was found in nearly half of all babies who died suddenly and without explanation over a decade at a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sudden Infant Death Syndrome&mdash;SIDS&mdash;has long baffled the medical community and is one of the leading causes of death in children under the age of one.&nbsp; Now, British researchers say they may have found that bacteria is a contributing factor in SIDS and say that potentially dangerous bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and <a href="http://www.yourlawyer.com/topics/overview/e_coli_escherichia_coli">E. coli</a> was found in nearly half of all babies who died suddenly and without explanation over a decade at a London hospital.<br /><br />Findings were published in Friday's Lancet medical journal.&nbsp; &quot;This may be another piece to the puzzle,&quot; said Marian Willinger, a SIDS expert at the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.&nbsp; Willinger was not connected to the British study. A <a href="http://www.sids.org/">SIDS</a> diagnosis means that no other cause of death can be found in an otherwise healthy infant who dies suddenly, usually in their sleep.&nbsp; In the United States, SIDS kills over 2,000 infants annually.<br /><br />The researchers cautioned that while the bacteria were found in the SIDS babies and bacterial infections have long been suspected by some doctors to play a role in SIDS, these results do not necessarily mean the infections were responsible for the deaths.&nbsp; &quot;We don't know whether it's a cause or