Pursuing Compensation for Burn Injuries and Product Liability Claims Nationwide
The Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm, manufactured by Kinova, is a life-changing device designed to aid individuals who have lost most or all functionality in one of their arms. Installed on motorized wheelchairs, the robotic arm enables users to reach, manipulate, and move objects, providing greater independence and quality of life. However, recent findings have revealed a dangerous defect in this device, posing serious risks to users.
Kinova issued a correction for the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm in response to an increased fire hazard caused by electrical leakage. Damage to the arm’s outer coating, combined with electrical issues in the wheelchair, can create a risk of electrical current flow, potentially causing burns, thermal injuries, or even death. The FDA has classified this correction as the most serious type of recall, underscoring the potential for severe injury or fatality. Although there have been no reported injuries or deaths to date, the defect remains a significant safety concern for users.
Kinova has urged users and distributors to take immediate action, including inspecting the robotic arm for damage, unplugging the device if risks are identified, and contacting the manufacturer for assessments and mitigations. While these corrective measures aim to reduce risks, the inherent danger of using a defective medical device remains, leaving users vulnerable to life-threatening harm. For those injured due to this defect, pursuing a legal claim can provide compensation for the harm suffered and hold the manufacturer accountable.
How Jaco Arm Defects Can Lead to Serious Harm
The dangers posed by the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm are far-reaching and severe. When the arm’s damaged outer coating comes into contact with an electrically powered wheelchair experiencing electrical leakage, it can result in a fire or thermal event. Users may sustain severe burns or other thermal injuries, which often require extensive medical treatment, including skin grafts, surgeries, and long-term care. In the most extreme cases, these incidents could result in fatalities due to electrical shock or uncontrollable fires.
The harm extends beyond physical injuries. Victims may also face psychological trauma, including anxiety or fear of using assistive devices in the future. Additionally, the financial burden of medical expenses, coupled with potential loss of income during recovery, can place immense stress on individuals and their families. For individuals with disabilities who rely on assistive technology to maintain independence, the impact of such an incident can be particularly devastating, undermining their mobility and confidence.
Victims of these defects have the right to seek legal recourse against the manufacturer. By pursuing a product liability claim, they can recover damages for medical costs, pain and suffering, lost income, and other related expenses. Such claims also play a crucial role in holding manufacturers accountable for ensuring the safety of medical devices that users rely on daily.
Filing a Lawsuit for Injuries Caused by the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm
Pursuing a product liability lawsuit for injuries caused by the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm involves a detailed legal process. The first step is determining whether the victim qualifies for a claim. Eligibility typically requires demonstrating that the victim used the product as intended and sustained injuries due to its defect. Evidence such as medical records, photographs of injuries, proof of the device’s condition, and compliance with the manufacturer’s instructions is critical in building a strong case.
Once eligibility is established, the victim’s attorney investigates the circumstances surrounding the injury. This includes reviewing reports about the device’s defect, analyzing how the product failed, and consulting with medical and engineering experts to link the defect to the injury. Attorneys may also examine whether the manufacturer failed to warn users adequately about the risks or if the defect was due to a design flaw or manufacturing error.
The legal process often involves negotiating with the manufacturer or its representatives to reach a settlement. However, if a fair agreement cannot be reached, the case may proceed to court. In such instances, the attorney presents evidence, expert testimony, and arguments to demonstrate that the defect caused the injuries and that the manufacturer is liable. Skilled legal representation is essential at every stage of the lawsuit to ensure that victims can secure the compensation they deserve.
Compensation Available in a Product Liability Claim
Victims harmed by the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm may recover several types of damages through a product liability lawsuit. Medical expenses, including hospital stays, surgeries, physical therapy, and future medical care, are a primary component of compensation. Victims may also recover lost income if they are unable to work during their recovery or experience long-term disability as a result of their injuries.
Pain and suffering damages are another significant component, addressing the physical and emotional toll of the injury. Victims who endure severe burns, for instance, often face prolonged pain, scarring, and psychological effects that diminish their quality of life. In cases where the manufacturer’s negligence is particularly egregious, courts may also award punitive damages to penalize the company and deter similar conduct in the future.
Compensation not only helps alleviate the financial burdens associated with injuries but also empowers victims to rebuild their lives. By holding manufacturers accountable, victims contribute to broader efforts to improve safety standards for assistive medical devices, ensuring that others are not harmed by similar defects.
Why You Need Legal Representation for a Jaco Arm Injury Claim
Pursuing a product liability claim for injuries caused by the Jaco Assistive Robotic Arm requires legal knowledge and resources. Cases involving defective medical devices often involve complex technical details, requiring thorough investigation and expert analysis. An experienced attorney plays a vital role in gathering evidence, negotiating with manufacturers, and presenting a compelling case in court.
Manufacturers often have significant legal resources and may attempt to downplay their liability or offer inadequate settlements. Having skilled legal representation ensures that victims’ interests are protected and that they receive fair compensation for their injuries. Additionally, attorneys can help navigate the intricacies of product liability law, including understanding statutes of limitations and filing claims within the required timeframe.
Choosing a law firm with a proven track record in product liability cases is crucial. Parker Waichman LLP has extensive experience handling complex injury claims, offering clients the knowledge and advocacy needed to pursue justice.
.svg){kind=small}
.avif)
.avif)