Federal Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Trial Set to Start

The Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch multidistrict litigation (MDL) is set to begin its first trial, serving as a bellwether for hundreds of similar cases. John Whitfield of Missouri claims the patch's rings broke, causing severe complications, and accuses Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. of negligence. Initially praised, the patch faced failures, leading to a Class I recall by the FDA due to serious risks. Over 1,500 lawsuits are pending in the MDL, with additional cases in Rhode Island Superior Court.

The massive Hernia Patch MDL is scheduled to start

Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch

 

Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch Litigation Start. The first trial in the massive Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch multidistrict litigation is scheduled to start today. The first case set for trial is considered to be representative of the hundreds of cases pending in the multidistrict litigation. It is considered a bellwether, or test case, and could set a standard for other cases in the litigation.

The first trial will involve a lawsuit filed by John Whitfield of Missouri. Whitfield was implanted with the Kugel patch in 2004.

His suit alleges that some of the rings broke under stress, and traveled through his body. As a result, Whitfield suffered a bowel obstruction, and had to have 22 cm of his intestine removed.

Whitfield’s lawsuit accuses Rhode Island-based Davol Inc. and its parent company, C.R. Bard, Inc. of negligence for failing to follow good manufacturing practices and failing to disclose the risk associated with the patches. It alleges that Davol continued to sell and distribute the Kugel patches after it knew or should have known they were failing.

When it was first introduced, the Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch was heralded as an innovation in hernia treatment. Unfortunately, by 2005, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) was receiving more and more reports of failure with the Kugel Patch. The reports were so alarming that the FDA issued a Class I recall of the Bard Composix Kugel Mesh X-Large Patch. Apparently, the recoil ring that opened the patch could break. When the ring broke, patients experienced bowel perforations and other serious problems.

Class I recall means that the recalled product poses a serious danger to patients

A Class I recall means that the recalled product poses a serious danger to patients still using it. The FDA warned doctors to quite using the patch. The FDA also warned patients who received the patch to seek medical attention if they experienced unexplained fever, persistent abdominal pain, or tenderness to the incision site. By February 2007, the Kugel Patch recall had been expanded twice to several other sizes of the device.

Just over 1,500 Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch lawsuits are currently pending in a multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court in Rhode Island. Another 1,774 currently pending in Rhode Island Superior Court are scheduled to go to trial starting in July.

Need Legal Help Regarding Kugel Mesh Hernia Patch?

The personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP offer free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online contact form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).

Free Consultation
Parker Waichman LLP
Are you inquiring about a new matter?
Please Describe the Details of Your Inquiry
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.8 from 549 Reviews

Client Reviews

Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.

The associates I dealt with, Shelly Davis & Christina Morace were extremely helpful and very pleasant to work with. They responded to my inquires in a timely fashion. They secured very favorable settlement.
John Ilardi
3 years ago
I would like to give a special shout out to Nicole who was a pleasure to work with. Her hard work, efficiency and professionalism is commendable. She communicated with me every step of the way and always stayed positive.
Cathy Aranzullo
9 months ago
Benita Rollis, paralegal, was very professional, yet compassionate. She made an emotional process bearable. Benita represented the firm very well. Michelle Josama picked up where Benita left off for the final leg of the process and is displaying the same professionalism as Benita. Thank you Parker Waichman for such a good experience during such an emotional journey.
Olivia Griffin
4 years ago
I'd like to say a few words about Joanne Stevens, NP. From the first phone call she answered ALL my questions and set me at ease with her knowledge and empathy. She calls me frequently and anytime I call her and get her VM, she returns my call within 24 hrs. without fail. I gave her 5 stars but she deserves 10. Thank you Joanne Stevens, just THANK YOU. Tina Schlobohm
Tina Schlobohm
5 years ago

Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident or have been injured by another party in some other way, we are here to stand up for your rights. Our personal injury attorneys have been representing injury victims and their families in Long Island and throughout the nation since the early 1980s.