NeuroBlate Brain Surgery Lawsuits

The NeuroBlate System, a laser-based surgical probe by Monteris Medical, is used for minimally invasive brain tumor removal. Despite its innovative design, the device has been linked to serious side effects due to defects, including overheating and inaccurate temperature readings, leading to brain tissue damage. The FDA issued a Class I recall and warned of potential risks. Legal investigations are underway, and affected patients may seek compensation. Parker Waichman LLP offers free consultations for those impacted by NeuroBlate-related complications.

The NeuroBlate System, a brain surgery probe using laser therapy to remove cancerous tumors, has device defects linked with dangerous side effects.

Adverse events have prompted device recall, in addition to a warning letter from the U.S Food and Drug Administration, drawing attention to inaccurate temperature readings that may cause intended overheating—resulting in serious damage to surrounding brain tissue.

Parker Waichman LLP is currently investigating NeuroBlate brain surgery lawsuits. 

About the NeuroBlate System

NeuroBlate is a surgical probe manufactured by Monteris Medical. Introduced in 2009 to U.S. markets, the NeuroBlate Laser Delivery Probe is a carbon dioxide (CO2)-cooled laser designed for minimally invasive surgery to remove cancerous or tumorous tissue in the brain.

Ablation occurs by heating the laser to 160 degrees Fahrenheit for spans ranging from 30 seconds to several minutes. The objective is to carefully kill the infected cells without damaging the surrounding brain tissue.

The secret to NeuroBlate’s success lies in its design. The probe’s size and minimally invasive use were due to a type of surgery known as stereotactic surgery. Stereotactic surgery utilizes 3-D positioning to create an image of the subject on a monitor typically using magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT).

Image of brain tumor that will undergo NeuroBlate surgery

 

MRgLITTs remove the need to take out large portions of the skull. Instead, the probe is inserted through a small incision into the brain, where it uses the laser to coagulate the cells of the malignancy and then eradicate them all at once.

This new technology allowed surgeons to correct issues that had previously been considered inoperable because of the sensitive nature of the brain and the complexity of the tumors. It may be for this reason that some of the very valid concerns raised about the NeuroBlate were ignored in overly-optimistic articles such as those published by City of Hope, Cleveland Clinic and even NeuroNews in November of this year.

These reviews may have praised the NeuroBlate system for its innovation and lifesaving possibilities, but the FDA has discovered potential risks related to NeuroBlate and its parent, Monteris Medical, announcing recalls and warning of a need for “extreme caution.”

NeuroBlate Side Effects

Although it’s used as a life-saving tool, the NeuroBlate system can also have significant risks associated with it. In an article published in the Journal of Neurosurgery in 2013, only 30 percent of patients improved from the NeuroBlate treatment while 10 percent worsened.

In the study itself, there were some crucial details omitted from the article, including the fact that 40 percent of patients experienced one or more of the following symptoms post-op:

  • Encephalitis (swelling of the brain)
  • Pseudoaneurysm (a burst blood vessel contained by surrounding tissue)
  • Dysphasia (deficiency of generation or comprehension of speech)
  • Hemiparesis (paralysis of ½ the body)
  • Homonymous Hemianopia (vision loss on the same side of both eyes)

These, however, are just the side effects from a successful surgery. In March 2018, the FDA announced new information about the probe and its risks.

In some operations, the probe may heat up too much and cause the tip or part of the probe to break and release CO2 into the brain. This heating has caused unanticipated damage to surrounding brain tissue and, when coupled with the release of flammable CO2, has even resulted in charring of sensitive brain tissue during the operation. Bleeding or permanent brain damage has also been reported as side effects of the surgery.

While faulty lasers cause much of this damage, the MRI monitors used to confirm the laser’s status have been found to give the wrong temperature during surgery, according to an FDA report.

While many of these errors have caused severe injuries or disabilities, it has also resulted in at least one fatality in the form of a patient who died after experiencing an intracranial hemorrhage.

FDA Actions Against Monteris Medical

A gloved hand piercing a brain as an abstract representation of the NeuroBlate system

 

In March 2018, the FDA released a letter addressing a Class I recall issued as of Oct. 5, 2017. A Class I recall is the gravest type of recall that the FDA has at their disposal.

It’s usually issued only when the use of the device may cause serious injuries or death. Due to numerous cases of unintended heating that damaged the probe and surrounding tissue, the FDA releases the Class I recall on all NeuroBlate probes from April 2013 to July 2017 including over 50 probes across the nation.

The probes in the recall are listed below:

  • SideFire 3.3 mm (SFP) Directional Laser Probe (sizes 000-5)
  • FullFire 3.3 mm DTP Diffusing Tip Laser Probe (sizes 000-5)
  • FullFire Select 2.2 mm Diffusing Tip Laser Probe (sizes 000-5)

Per the Class I recall, Monteris has also issued multiple product advisories from Oct. 2017 until Dec. 2017, but these efforts did not convince the FDA who felt “Monteris has not sufficiently mitigated the risk of unintended probe tip heating.”

The FDA has also released letters to healthcare professionals, beginning on April 24, 2018, about the possibility of inaccurate MRI readings during surgeries utilizing NeuroBlate and other stereotactic surgical options. These discrepancies mainly focussed on temperature inaccuracies that could cause fatal damage as the lasers heat past safe limits without the doctor’s knowledge.

In an address from Nov. 8, 2018, the FDA has indicated that while NeuroBlate and others in the field are taking steps to minimize and mitigate risk, the results are slow to fruition for such a delicate procedure.

The FDA released this summary statement:

“The FDA recommends health care providers should strongly consider treating patients using alternative procedures if available. Health care providers who do not believe there is a viable alternative should use the device with extreme caution.”

Legal Compensation for NeuroBlate Surgery

Contact Parker Waichman LLP For Your Free NeuroBlate Case Review

In the wake of the recalls, Monteris Medical has received FDA approval for a newer fiber-optic probe that will hit markets sometime in the future. However, if you or a loved one have suffered complications or wrongful death following a magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy, you may be entitled to compensation.

Your initial consultation with our firm is absolutely free, and we will generally advance the costs of any claim we pursue on your behalf. We strive to make the process as stress-free as possible because we know you have already been through enough. Contact us today to find out more information about how we can help you and your family.

Contact our firm today by filling out our online form or by calling 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529) for a free consultation.

Free Consultation
Parker Waichman LLP
Are you inquiring about a new matter?
Please Describe the Details of Your Inquiry
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.8 from 549 Reviews

Client Reviews

Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.

Thank you Parker Waichman LLP and especially paralegal Benita Rollis who guided me through the whole process. She was very professional, courteous and always called me back when I had any questions. I was very satisfied and highly recommend Parker Waichman LLP.
Denise Saraceno
3 years ago
About 7 years ago, my sister was in a car accident and was very pleased with the way the firm handled her case. Unforuntately, I was in a car accident and she recommended that I call Parker Waichman. I could not be more happy with the way the case was handled and the outcome. The staff is also very friendly, which was refreshing.
Paul Schaeffer
11 years ago
Parker Waichman and my attorney kept me updated on all aspects of my case and how it was proceeding. I was pleased with the outcome.
Philip Ambrosino
2 months ago
Thank you Parker Waichman for all your time and effort you gave me during my process. It was very much appreciated. Positive Responsiveness, Professionalism
Danette Cabassa
3 years ago

Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident or have been injured by another party in some other way, we are here to stand up for your rights. Our personal injury attorneys have been representing injury victims and their families in Long Island and throughout the nation since the early 1980s.