New Jersey Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer MDL Continues to Grow

Four additional talcum powder lawsuits have been added to the multidistrict litigation (MDL) in New Jersey, where plaintiffs claim that using talcum powder in the genital area led to ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson is accused of not warning consumers about these risks. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred cases from Missouri and Pennsylvania to the MDL. Johnson & Johnson has faced several multimillion-dollar verdicts, including a recent $110 million award. The MDL aims to streamline similar lawsuits, while individual cases remain separate.

four more lawsuits are transferred into the mass tort.

NJ Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer MDL Continues to Grow

4 Talcum Powder Lawsuits Transferred into MDL The talcum powder multidistrict litigation (MDL) in New Jersey continues to grow, as four more lawsuits are transferred into the mass tort. Plaintiffs in the MDL allege that genital use of talcum powder contributed to ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson allegedly failed to warn of the risks. The company has been hit with several multimillion dollar verdicts involving talcum powder, with the most recent case totaling $110 million.

The product liability attorneys at Parker Waichman LLP have decades of experience representing clients in lawsuits over allegedly defective or dangerous products. The firm, which regularly provides talcum powder lawsuit updates, continues to offer free legal consultations to individuals with questions about filing a talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit.

According to court documents, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) transferred four lawsuits from two states into the MDL in New Jersey on May 31, 2017. Three cases are being transferred from the Eastern District of Missouri and one is being transferred from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Talcum powder lawsuits are filed on behalf of women who used J&J’s talcum products, including Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower. Plaintiffs allege that use of these products in the genital region increased the risk of ovarian cancer and that J&J failed to warn of the risks.

An MDL is a type of mass tort where similar lawsuits are grouped together in one court. Consolidating cases in this manner makes the legal process more efficient because it streamlines litigation and eliminates duplicate discovery. Lawsuits in a mass tort remain separate and plaintiffs are processed individually. This is different from a class action lawsuit, where one complaint represents an entire group of plaintiffs against a common defendant.

In addition to the MDL, J&J faces roughly 1,000 talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits in St. Louis, Missouri before Judge Rex Burlison.

J&J Talcum Powder Verdicts

Parker Waichman comments that J&J has been hit with several multimillion dollar verdicts in the talcum powder litigation. Most recently, jurors awarded $110 million in May 2017. The plaintiff is a Virginia woman who used talcum products for 40 years. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2012, allegedly due to using Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower. Like other talcum plaintiffs, she alleges that the fine particles can travel up the female reproductive tract and promote cancer-causing changes in the ovaries over time.

At trial, jurors were asked to punish J&J for its “reprehensible” actions. Plaintiff’s attorneys said that punitive damages should be substantial enough for J&J to feel, noting that it is a $70 billion company.

According to Law360, the jury found for the plaintiff on all counts, including conspiracy, breach of implied warranty and negligence. J&J, its Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. unit and talc supplier Imerys Talc America Inc. were all found liable.

The award consisted of $5.4 million in compensatory damages. J&J was hit with $66 million in punitive damages while J&J Consumer was hit with $39 million in punitive damages and talc supplier Imerys was hit with $50,000 in punitive damages. The jury awarded punitive damages as an additional form of punishment when they feel behavior warrants it. In returning the verdict, jurors determined the two J&J companies to be 99 percent at fault for the plaintiff’s injuries, and Imerys to be one percent at fault. The trial took place over 17 days.

Dr. Daniel Cramer, a Harvard physician who has published research on the link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, testified on behalf of the plaintiffs. He said he concluded with “medical and scientific certainty” that using talcum powder in the genital region caused the plaintiff’s cancer.

This is not the only multimillion dollar verdict issued in the talcum powder ovarian cancer litigation. In 2016, juries handed down three consecutive verdicts against J&J, awarding verdicts of $72 million, $55 million and $70 million. In the fourth trial, jurors found for J&J.

J&J is being sued over talcum powder products in state and federal courts nationwide. A filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) shows that J&J is facing at least 3,100 talcum powder product liability lawsuits alleging ovarian cancer.

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Background

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Background Info.

Talc, the main component of talcum powder, is a mineral composed of magnesium, silicon and oxygen. Talcum powder is a common ingredient in many personal hygiene and cosmetic products, such as body and facial powders. Talcum products absorb excess moisture and reduce friction. It is used as a baby powder to prevent diaper rash. Some women also use talcum powder as a feminine hygiene product when sprinkled on sanitary napkins, underwear or the genital region.

Plaintiffs in the talcum powder litigation allege that genital use of talc increases the risk of ovarian cancer. Lawsuits site studies published since the 1970s suggesting an increased risk, and allege that J&J should have updated the warning label on these products to warn consumers. For example, in 1971 researchers found talc particles embedded in ovarian tumors.

Researchers continue to investigate the relationship between talcum use and ovarian cancer. Recently, the European Journal of Cancer Prevention published a study showing a small, but statistically significant link between talcum use and ovarian cancer. The study was a meta-analysis, meaning researchers used data from previously published studies to identify a common effect.

Most talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuits were filed individually. However, court records indicate that J&J is facing class action lawsuits as well. One class action represents 81 plaintiffs who allege that ovarian cancer is caused by “unreasonably dangerous and defective nature of talcum powder and Johnson & Johnson’s wrongful and negligent conduct in the research, development, testing, manufacture, production, promotion, distribution, marketing, and sale of talcum powder.”

Need Legal Help Regarding Filing a Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

If you or someone you know wants to learn more about filing a talcum powder lawsuit, contact the personal injury attorneys at Parker Waichman today. Our firm offers free, no-obligation case evaluations. For more information, fill out our online form or call 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529).
Free Consultation
Parker Waichman LLP
Are you inquiring about a new matter?
Please Describe the Details of Your Inquiry
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.8 from 549 Reviews

Client Reviews

Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.

Excellent service from the best lawyers in New York Their customer service is excellent Especially Julie, Maryann, Dawn and the hardest the best JORGE Thank you all very much
Jhony Gonzalez
a year ago
I went to the 27299 location and stop to Frank no one believed us with a car accident we were at fault and Frank still pulled through one of the best lawyers,no sketchiness straight to business and always reassured us.if there was a 6 start review I would put 6
Beats By Manni
8 months ago
I am happy to choose Parker Waichman to handle my case. They are very professional and attentive, they always answer any questions I have. I also thank Denny Tang, Kathy Núñez and Jorge Peniche for making me feel comfortable with their help. Thank you for everything you are doing for me.
Francisco Aviles
6 years ago
Could not of asked for a better experience. Never had one issue, Lynda Luckman was the nicest and easiest person to deal with while keeping me updated throughout the whole procedure for my case.
Gregory Levine
6 years ago

Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident or have been injured by another party in some other way, we are here to stand up for your rights. Our personal injury attorneys have been representing injury victims and their families in Long Island and throughout the nation since the early 1980s.