Thousands of Gallons of Beverage Base Lemonade Pulled from Shelves Amid FDAClass II Recall
A major recall has been issued for more than 8,000 units of lemonade distributed across multiple states after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classified the product as a Class II health risk. Oak Cliff Beverage Works (OCBW), based in Dallas, Texas, voluntarily recalled its Beverage Base Lemonade and Beverage Base Sweet & Sour products due to the undeclared presence of Yellow #5, a synthetic food dye known to cause adverse reactions in certain consumers.
The recall was officially issued on January 31, 2025, with the FDA classifying the risk level on February 25, 2025. The affected products include the 3-gallon and 5-gallon Beverage Base Lemonade and the 3-gallon Beverage Base Sweet & Sour, with best-by dates extending into late 2025 and early 2026. These products were distributed to Arkansas, California, Colorado, Kentucky, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, potentially affecting thousands of businesses and consumers.
The Health Risks Associated with Yellow #5
Yellow #5, also known as Tartrazine, is an artificial food coloring that has been linked to various health issues. While the FDA permits its use in food and beverages, regulations require that products containing this additive be clearly labeled, allowing consumers to make informed choices. Ingesting Yellow #5 can cause hypersensitivity reactions in some individuals, particularly those with allergies or food intolerances. Reported symptoms range from mild skin irritation and hives to more severe respiratory issues, including wheezing and difficulty breathing.
Individuals with asthma and those prone to allergic reactions are most at risk, as Yellow #5 has been shown to trigger attacks in some cases. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the possible link between artificial food dyes and behavioral issues in children, including hyperactivity and attention difficulties. Because of these potential effects, the FDA requires food manufacturers to list Yellow #5 on product labels to warn consumers who may need to avoid it.
By failing to disclose the presence of this additive, Oak Cliff Beverage Works violated federal labeling regulations, putting consumers at risk of unexpected allergic reactions and health complications. While the FDA’s Class II recall suggests that the likelihood of serious health consequences is low, the recall remains significant because it highlights the dangers of mislabeling consumable products.
Legal Implications and Consumer Rights
When a food product is mislabeled and leads to adverse health effects, affected consumers may have the right to pursue legal action against the manufacturer. Under product liability law, companies are required to ensure that their products are safe and that consumers are adequately warned about potential risks. When a company fails to disclose an ingredient that could cause harm, it may be held responsible for any resulting injuries.
Victims who suffer allergic reactions or other health complications from consuming the recalled lemonade may have grounds to file a failure-to-warn lawsuit. In such cases, the primary legal argument is that the manufacturer did not provide sufficient information about the product’s ingredients, depriving consumers of the ability to avoid known allergens.
Beyond individual health concerns, businesses that purchased and served the recalled lemonade may also face losses. Restaurants, cafes, and food service providers that unknowingly sold contaminated products could experience financial damages, including loss of customer trust, potential liability for serving a mislabeled product, and wasted inventory. These businesses may also have legal options to recover losses from the manufacturer.
Filing a Product Liability Lawsuit
For consumers who suffered harm after consuming the recalled lemonade, the legal process typically begins with documenting the illness or reaction. Seeking medical attention is crucial, as official medical records serve as evidence linking the consumption of the product to the adverse reaction. Victims should also preserve any remaining product, including packaging and receipts, to help establish that they consumed the mislabeled lemonade.
The next step involves filing a claim against the manufacturer, Oak Cliff Beverage Works, which may be held responsible under strict liability laws for distributing a mislabeled product. The company may argue that the recall was voluntary and that no serious health risks have been reported, but consumers who suffered legitimate harm can still pursue compensation. The case will likely involve medical experts who can testify about the health effects of Yellow #5 and how its presence in the beverage led to an allergic reaction or illness.
If a settlement is not reached, the case could proceed to trial, where a judge or jury will determine whether the manufacturer should be held liable. Courts may consider whether the company acted negligently in failing to disclose Yellow #5, whether they should have been more diligent in their labeling practices, and whether their actions put consumers at unnecessary risk.
Why Legal Representation is Essential
Filing a product liability lawsuit against a beverage manufacturer requires legal knowledge and resources that most consumers do not have on their own. Food industry giants and beverage companies often have large legal teams to defend against claims, making it difficult for individuals to obtain fair compensation without representation. An attorney can help gather evidence, consult medical professionals, and build a strong case to prove that the manufacturer’s negligence directly caused harm.
A lawyer also plays a critical role in negotiating settlements, ensuring that victims receive compensation that covers medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and any long-term health effects. Without legal guidance, consumers may struggle to prove the connection between the mislabeled lemonade and their health issues, leading to denied claims or unfairly low settlement offers.
Businesses that suffered financial losses due to the recall may also benefit from legal representation to seek compensation for wasted inventory and lost revenue. Legal action may help hold manufacturers accountable, ensuring that similar labeling errors do not happen in the future.
Compensation Available in a Product Liability Claim
Consumers affected by the mislabeled lemonade may be eligible for compensation covering a range of damages. Medical costs, including emergency treatment and ongoing care for allergic reactions, can be recovered in a lawsuit. Individuals who missed work due to illness may also seek lost wages. In cases where severe reactions occurred, pain and suffering damages may be awarded to account for the physical and emotional distress caused by the allergic reaction.
For businesses, financial damages may include the cost of purchasing recalled inventory, lost revenue due to the inability to serve affected products, and any legal liability they may have faced for serving mislabeled beverages to customers. If the manufacturer’s actions are deemed particularly negligent, courts may award punitive damages to deter similar misconduct in the future.
CONTACT PARKER WAICHMAN LLP FOR A FREE CASE REVIEW
If you or a loved one experienced an allergic reaction or other health issues after consuming the recalled Beverage Base Lemonade, you may have a legal case against the manufacturer. Parker Waichman LLP has a team of attorneys dedicated to holding negligent companies accountable for unsafe and mislabeled products. Contact us by calling 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529) today for a free consultation. Protect your rights and seek the compensation you deserve. Regardless of your location or where your injury occurred, our nationwide product injury law firm is ready to assist you.
.svg){kind=small}
.avif)
.avif)
