Understanding the Risks of the Accolade Pacemaker Recall and Legal Options for Victims
Boston Scientific has recalled several models of its Accolade pacemakers and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-Ps) due to a manufacturing issue that could cause these devices to enter Safety Mode unexpectedly. The recall, identified as the most serious type by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), warns that affected devices may lead to life-threatening complications, including slow heart rates, fainting, or even death.
This recall impacts multiple models, including Accolade, Proponent, Essentio, and Altrua 2 pacemakers, as well as Visionist and Valitude CRT-P devices. The problem stems from a defect in the battery, which may lead to the device resetting multiple times within 48 hours and entering Safety Mode. Once in Safety Mode, the pacemaker can no longer function properly, and patients who rely on these devices may experience dangerous interruptions in heart pacing. The only solution is to remove and replace the faulty device, requiring patients to undergo additional surgery.
The Risks of a Malfunctioning Pacemaker
Pacemakers play a critical role in regulating heart rhythms, particularly for individuals with bradyarrhythmias—conditions that cause dangerously slow heartbeats. Patients who depend on these devices for life-sustaining therapy cannot afford sudden malfunctions. The recalled Boston Scientific pacemakers have an increased risk of failure during remote data collection or other high-powered operations, which can trigger Safety Mode and lead to serious health risks.
For patients whose pacemakers enter Safety Mode, the immediate danger is an inadequate heart rate. This can cause dizziness, fainting, shortness of breath, and in severe cases, cardiac arrest. If a malfunction occurs without warning, patients may collapse while driving, walking, or performing daily activities, leading to secondary injuries. Because these pacemakers are implanted in the body, replacement surgery is necessary when a failure occurs. Any additional surgical procedure carries its own risks, including infection, bleeding, and complications from anesthesia.
The FDA has already documented at least 832 injuries and two deaths linked to these defective pacemakers. These numbers highlight the severity of the issue and the potential for even more cases if the affected devices remain in use without intervention. Boston Scientific has advised healthcare providers to schedule replacements for at-risk patients, particularly those whose remaining battery life is four years or less. However, scheduling these replacements may take time, leaving some patients vulnerable in the meantime.
Legal Rights for Victims of the Pacemaker Recall
Patients who have suffered harm due to a malfunctioning Boston Scientific pacemaker may have legal options to seek compensation. When medical devices fail due to manufacturing defects, the manufacturer can be held responsible for any resulting injuries. In this case, Boston Scientific’s recalled pacemakers have put thousands of patients at risk, and those who have been injured—or required unnecessary surgery—may be able to file a product liability lawsuit.
Product liability law allows victims to pursue claims against manufacturers when a defective product causes harm. These claims may be based on defective design, manufacturing defects, or failure to warn patients of potential dangers. In this recall, the defect originates from a faulty battery component, which suggests a manufacturing defect that should have been caught before these devices were distributed.
Victims who have experienced complications due to a pacemaker entering Safety Mode may be eligible for compensation, including reimbursement for medical expenses, costs associated with replacement surgery, pain and suffering, and lost wages for time missed from work. In cases where a patient has died due to a pacemaker failure, surviving family members may have grounds to file a wrongful death lawsuit.
The Process of Filing a Lawsuit Against Boston Scientific
For those affected by the recall, the first step in pursuing a legal claim is gathering medical records that document the pacemaker’s failure and the health complications that followed. These records serve as evidence that the defective device caused harm. Patients should also obtain documentation of any surgical procedures needed to remove or replace the device.
A lawsuit against Boston Scientific would begin with filing a legal complaint, which outlines how the defective pacemaker led to injury or unnecessary medical treatment. The company may attempt to settle claims before trial, but if a fair settlement is not reached, the case could proceed to court. During litigation, attorneys will investigate Boston Scientific’s manufacturing process to determine whether the company failed to conduct proper testing or ignored early warnings about the defect.
Having legal representation is essential in a product liability case, particularly against a large medical device manufacturer. Companies like Boston Scientific have teams of attorneys working to minimize their financial liability. Without proper legal guidance, victims may struggle to obtain the full compensation they deserve. A lawyer can handle negotiations, present evidence of the company’s negligence, and ensure that victims receive adequate financial recovery for their suffering.
Potential Compensation for Victims
Patients affected by the recall may be entitled to various forms of compensation, depending on the severity of their injuries and the impact on their health. This could include reimbursement for hospital stays, surgical procedures, follow-up care, and rehabilitation costs. Those who suffered serious health complications may also be compensated for pain and suffering, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life.
If a pacemaker failure caused additional injuries, such as a fall due to fainting or a car accident due to sudden dizziness, compensation may extend to cover those damages as well. In cases involving wrongful death, family members may be entitled to damages for funeral expenses, loss of companionship, and the financial support the deceased person provided.
.svg){kind=small}
.avif)
.avif)
