JOMO Magnetic Chess Game Injury Lawsuit Lawyers

The CPSC Advises Immediate Disposal Due to Severe Ingestion Risks for Children

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has recently issued a strong warning to consumers about a hazardous product that could pose serious health risks, especially to children. The product in question is the “Magnetic Chess Game,” sold by the China-based seller JOMO. According to the CPSC, this game contains magnets that do not meet U.S. federal safety regulations, making them a significant ingestion risk. Despite the agency’s efforts to address these concerns with the manufacturer, JOMO has not agreed to recall the product or offer a remedy. As a result, the CPSC is urging anyone who has purchased this game to stop using it immediately and dispose of it safely.

The Danger of Ingesting Magnets

The primary risk associated with the Magnetic Chess Game lies in the loose magnets that can easily become separated from the game and potentially swallowed by children. When high-powered magnets are ingested, they can be incredibly dangerous. The magnets can attract each other or other metal objects within the digestive system, leading to serious complications. These complications can include intestinal blockages, infection, blood poisoning, and in some cases, even death.

Children are particularly vulnerable to these risks. The CPSC estimates that approximately 2,400 cases of magnet ingestion were treated in U.S. hospitals annually between 2017 and 2021. The agency is also aware of eight deaths related to magnet ingestion from 2005 through 2021, two of which occurred outside the United States. These numbers highlight the severe and sometimes fatal consequences of ingesting magnets, making the CPSC’s warning about the Magnetic Chess Game all the more urgent.

The Scope of the Problem

The Magnetic Chess Game sold by JOMO has been available online at Walmart.com in a blue box labeled “Magnetic” on both the front and back. However, despite its name, the game does not include traditional chess pieces but instead contains about 20 loose black magnets. The exact duration of time this product was available for purchase is unclear, as the seller has not cooperated with the CPSC’s investigation. The CPSC’s inability to gather more detailed information from JOMO further complicates efforts to assess the full extent of the danger posed by this product.

Legal Recourse for Victims

Given the serious risks associated with the Magnetic Chess Game, individuals who have suffered injuries or who have had children injured due to the ingestion of magnets from this product may be entitled to seek compensation through a product liability lawsuit. Victims of such injuries can potentially recover damages for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other related costs. However, the process of filing a lawsuit and proving a product’s liability can be complex, which is why having an experienced attorney is crucial.

A lawyer specializing in product liability can guide victims through each step of the legal process, from gathering evidence and filing claims to negotiating settlements or representing them in court. The attorney will work to establish that the product in question was indeed defective or dangerous and that the defect directly caused the injury. In cases like this, where the manufacturer has failed to comply with safety standards, the attorney may also argue that the company was negligent in its duty to protect consumers.

Potential Damages in a Product Liability Lawsuit

If successful, a product liability lawsuit can result in compensation for a variety of damages. These may include:

• Medical Expenses: Compensation for the costs of treating injuries caused by the product, including hospital stays, surgeries, medications, and ongoing medical care.
• Pain and Suffering: Damages awarded for the physical pain and emotional distress experienced by the victim as a result of their injuries.
• Lost Wages: If the injury caused the victim to miss work, they might be compensated for lost income during their recovery period.
• Punitive Damages: In some cases, courts may award punitive damages to punish the manufacturer for particularly egregious conduct and to deter similar behavior in the future.