How Device Misuse Can Lead to Serious Injury and Steps to Pursue Compensation
The Sentec/Percussionaire Phasitron 5 in-line valve, an essential component of the Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation (IPV) system used for patients on mechanical ventilation, has recently come under scrutiny due to the potential for accidental misuse. This device is designed to help improve gas exchange and keep a patient’s airways clear during ventilation. However, an alarming issue has surfaced: improper use of the valve’s expiratory port plug has resulted in several patient injuries. This problem prompted the company to issue a correction classified by the FDA as Class I—the most serious type of correction, indicating that the misuse could lead to severe harm or even death.
The Phasitron 5 system includes a blue plug that should be removed from the expiratory port during direct airway therapy. If the plug is left in place, patients may receive dangerously high levels of pressure from the ventilator. This can cause life-threatening complications, including a heart attack, pneumothorax (air trapped between the lung and chest wall), airway tears, and in extreme cases, death. While no fatalities have been reported to date, there have been six documented cases of injury directly related to this misuse.
In response, Sentec/Percussionaire has updated the instructions for use (IFU) to clarify that the blue cap is meant only as a protective cover when therapy is not being administered. They have also urged medical institutions to revise their protocols to reflect this updated guidance, and all existing Phasitron 5 devices will now be re-labeled to prevent further incidents.
How Misuse of the Phasitron 5 In-Line Valve Can Cause Harm
Medical devices like the Phasitron 5 in-line valve are designed to support life, but when used incorrectly, they can pose significant risks to patients. In this case, the improper use of the expiratory port plug has the potential to cause serious injury. The purpose of the Phasitron 5 valve is to facilitate safe and effective mechanical ventilation by helping patients maintain clear airways and improve gas exchange. However, if the valve’s expiratory port is blocked during therapy, patients can be exposed to excessive pressure within their lungs, which may lead to severe complications.
One of the most dangerous outcomes of this misuse is a condition known as pneumothorax. This occurs when air leaks into the space between the lung and the chest wall, causing the lung to collapse. Pneumothorax can be life-threatening and requires immediate medical intervention. In other cases, patients may suffer from a heart attack due to the excessive strain on the cardiovascular system caused by increased pressure from the ventilator. Airway tears, which can result from the intense pressure buildup, are another serious risk, leading to further respiratory complications or infections.
These injuries can have devastating consequences for patients and their families. Those affected may face extended hospital stays, additional surgeries, and long-term health issues that affect their quality of life. Beyond the physical pain and suffering, the financial burden of medical treatment can be overwhelming, particularly if the injury prevents the patient from working or leads to permanent disability.
Legal Options for Victims of Phasitron 5 In-Line Valve Misuse
For patients harmed by the improper use of the Phasitron 5 in-line valve, legal options may be available to seek compensation. Product liability lawsuits are designed to hold manufacturers accountable when their devices cause injury due to design flaws, manufacturing defects, or inadequate instructions. In this case, victims may be able to file a lawsuit against Sentec/Percussionaire if they can prove that the misuse of the valve resulted in their injuries.
To pursue a claim, injured patients should first consult with an attorney experienced in product liability law. The attorney will gather relevant information, including medical records, details of the injury, and evidence of how the misuse of the Phasitron 5 valve contributed to the harm. The lawsuit may focus on whether the manufacturer failed to provide clear instructions for use or whether the initial labeling was inadequate to prevent misuse.
The legal process for product liability cases typically begins with an investigation, where both sides collect evidence to support their positions. During this phase, your attorney will work to demonstrate that the device’s misuse directly caused the injury and that the manufacturer could have prevented the harm with better instructions or design. The case may progress to settlement negotiations, where both parties attempt to reach a financial agreement. If a settlement is not reached, the case could proceed to trial, where a judge or jury will determine the outcome.
Throughout this process, having a knowledgeable attorney is essential. Medical device manufacturers often have vast resources and legal teams prepared to defend against claims. An attorney will help ensure that you are treated fairly and that you receive the compensation you deserve for your injuries.
Damages Recoverable in a Product Liability Lawsuit
In a product liability lawsuit related to the Phasitron 5 valve, victims may be entitled to various types of compensation, depending on the severity of their injuries. Medical expenses are typically the most significant category of damages, covering the cost of emergency treatment, surgeries, hospital stays, rehabilitation, and any ongoing care required due to the injury. Victims may also be compensated for lost wages if their injury prevents them from working during recovery. In cases where the injury results in long-term or permanent disability, future lost earnings may also be part of the damages.
Additionally, victims can pursue compensation for pain and suffering, which addresses the physical and emotional toll of the injury. Serious medical conditions like pneumothorax or heart attack can cause considerable pain and anxiety, and victims may experience lasting emotional distress related to their trauma.
In some cases, punitive damages may be awarded if the court finds that the manufacturer’s conduct was particularly negligent or reckless. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant and serve as a deterrent to prevent similar behavior in the future.
.svg){kind=small}
.avif)
.avif)