CPSC Proposes New Rules to Inform the Public on Product Recalls Better

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has proposed new rules for disclosing recalled product information under Section 6(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act. The changes would require the CPSC to notify manufacturers before releasing information, raising concerns about confidentiality and fairness. The proposal has sparked debate among commissioners, with some advocating for repeal to ensure timely warnings, while others worry about protecting business information. The comment period for these changes is 45 days from publication in the Federal Register, and businesses are encouraged to provide feedback.

Cpsc proposes new rules to inform the public on product recalls better
Consumer Product Safety

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has proposed new rules concerning its procedures for disclosing recalled product information to the public under Section 6(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act. The proposed rule would change how the CPSC advises the public about product recalls. For example, the proposed regulation would require the CPSC to provide manufacturers or private labelers with advance notice and the opportunity to comment on information it intends to release to the public.

These proposed rule changes to Section 6(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act have raised concerns among businesses. Those against the rules changes stated that the proposed rules might erode confidentiality and fairness safeguards which are critical to encouraging companies to report potential safety problems to the CPSC. The CPSC has sought to revise the rule twice since its adoption back in 1983, and the comment period for the proposed changes is 45 days from publication in the Federal Register. The proposed rule changes to Section 6(b) are deemed critical for businesses that manufacture, import, or sell consumer products, and business leaders are urged to share their views on the proposed changes.

The proposed rule changes have also sparked differing views among the Commission’s commissioners, with some commissioners arguing for the repeal of 6(b) to ensure timely warnings about dangerous consumer products. Other commissioners are concerned that the proposed changes will upset the balance between public access and safeguarding confidential business information. The new proposal includes several changes to the interpretation of 6(b) and will impact all consumer product companies. Currently, Section 6(b)(5) provides an exemption to limits on public disclosure should the CPSC issue imminent hazard findings under Section 12 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, so 6(b) does not serve as a “gag rule” that prevents the CPSC from alerting the public about potentially hazardous products.

Proving Liability in a Product Liability Case

To prove liability in a product liability case, a plaintiff generally must demonstrate the following elements:

  1. The product was defective: The plaintiff must show that the product had a defect, such as a design defect, manufacturing defect, or warning defect. A design defect happens when a product is inherently dangerous due to a flaw in its design. A manufacturing defect occurs when a product deviates from its intended design during production. A warning defect occurs when a product fails to warn consumers of its potential dangers sufficiently.
  2. The defect caused the plaintiff’s injuries: The plaintiff must show that the defect in the product caused their injuries. This typically involves establishing a causal connection between the defect and the harm suffered.
  3. The plaintiff was utilizing the product as it is intended: The plaintiff must show that they were using the product in a manner that was reasonably foreseeable to the manufacturer.
  4. The product was not substantially modified: The plaintiff must show that the product was not substantially modified from its original condition when it left the manufacturer’s control.

To prove these elements, the plaintiff typically relies on evidence such as product testing, expert testimony, witness statements, and documentation related to the product’s design, manufacturing, and marketing. The plaintiff must also establish the applicable legal standard for liability, which can vary depending on the specific facts of the case and the jurisdiction in which the case is brought.

CONTACT PARKER WAICHMAN LLP FOR A FREE CASE REVIEW

Parker Waichman LLP helps families recover compensation for harm caused by dangerous products. If you or a loved one has been injured and you suspect the injury is due to a defective product, Parker Waichman LLP is here to help. Our experienced product liability attorneys are dedicated to helping victims recover compensation for their losses. Call us today at our toll-free number, 1-800-YOURLAWYER (1-800-968-7529), to learn about your legal options.

Free Consultation
Parker Waichman LLP
Are you inquiring about a new matter?
What type of accident did you have?
Please share a few details about your inquiry so we can connect you with the best person to assist you.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
4.8 from 549 Reviews

Client Reviews

Our law firm is ready to represent you in your injury case. We’ve helped many New York residents as well as those needing help nationwide. Contact our team for a free case consultation today.

My husband lost his parents within 2 years. His father most recently and we are distraught over his care prior to passing. We decided to call Parker Waichman, and were greeted by Joanna. We sat and explained our story, and literally felt like we were sitting with family. Joanna went out of her way to make sure we understood every single detail, and were comfortable with our choices. Lawyers can be intimidating, but we never once felt that way. We are very comfortable with our choice to use them and would recommend anyone to use their services. (Joanna even went out of her way to hand deliver the most delicious olive oil, not sold in the U.S to our home!!)
Diane Terracciano
Awesome attorneys!
Glenn Rice
They have handled a legal matter for us and it has all been taken care of smooth process. Great firm.
Maria Arroyo
Gina Viti..My Lawyer with PW LLP.., Gina is an extra special person with Neverending patience..I am OLD SCHOOL..She had to walk me through all necessary steps and did so with knowledge and kind consideration..Not easy to deal with an elder..Gina miraculously got my HEARING going over the phone..Gina is a thorough all encompassing Lawyer..I so much appreciate her and will never forget her
Dorothy Zaharatos

Contact Us Today

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident or have been injured by another party in some other way, we are here to stand up for your rights. Our personal injury attorneys have been representing injury victims and their families in Long Island and throughout the nation since the early 1980s.