New Evidence Links PFAS Exposure to Testicular Cancer Risk in Military Firefighters

Gary Flook dedicated 37 years of his life to the Air Force, primarily as a firefighter at the former Chanute Air Force Base in Illinois and the erstwhile Grissom Air Force Base in Indiana. During his service, Flook consistently used the aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) for training, a potent fire suppressant that has since been identified as hazardous.

Despite also volunteering at his community fire department and using the same foam, Flook remained unaware of its potential health hazards until 2000. That year, at 45, he was diagnosed with testicular cancer, necessitating surgery and chemotherapy.

Several studies had previously highlighted a concerning trend: firefighters, both in the military and civilian sectors, exhibited elevated rates of testicular cancer. Many of these studies implied that the chemicals, particularly perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present in the foam, might be responsible.

However, only a recent federal study has conclusively established a direct correlation between PFOS, a variety of PFAS, and testicular cancer in military personnel.

This groundbreaking research, involving the National Cancer Institute and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, analyzed blood samples from Air Force personnel. The study revealed that firefighters exhibited increased PFAS concentrations in their blood. Moreover, those diagnosed with testicular cancer showed higher levels of PFOS.

Commenting on the study, Kyle Steenland, a professor at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health, underscored the significance of this research in understanding the association between PFAS and testicular cancer. Nevertheless, he emphasized the need for additional research on the subject.

In the past, AFFF variants containing PFOS have been substituted with newer versions with other toxic PFAS components. Despite growing awareness of their health implications, the Department of Defense continues to employ them due to their efficiency in combatting high-temperature fires.

The Defense Department’s hesitance to acknowledge the risks and employ safer alternatives has garnered significant criticism. Their longstanding use of these foams, described by some as “just soap and water,” has now prompted Congressional intervention, demanding more substantial measures against the hazardous substances.

PFAS chemicals, often labeled “forever chemicals” due to their persistence, have been around since the 1940s. Apart from firefighting foams, they are found in various products, from cosmetics to nonstick pans. Alarmingly, nearly all Americans have detectable levels of PFAS in their bloodstream, primarily from contaminated drinking water sources.

Concerns regarding PFAS’s health and environmental impacts have instigated numerous lawsuits and legislative measures against manufacturers. Gary Flook is among those suing companies like 3M, DuPont, and Kidde-Fenwal for their role in producing these dangerous chemicals.

While the Department of Veterans Affairs currently does not endorse PFAS blood tests, this may change soon. Pending legislation might necessitate the VA to address health conditions linked to PFAS exposure.

As more evidence accumulates, the connection between PFAS exposure and cancers like testicular germ cell tumors becomes undeniable. With this understanding, researchers continue to advocate for broader testing and improved awareness, even as many affected individuals, like Mr. Flook, grapple with the life-altering impacts of their exposure.

Filing a lawsuit can be a complex decision, driven by various reasons and objectives. Here are some primary reasons individuals or entities might choose to file a lawsuit:

1. Compensation for Damages: One of the most common reasons for filing a lawsuit is to seek compensation for damages or injuries suffered due to another party’s negligence or intentional actions. This could be for physical injuries, property damage, financial losses, or emotional distress.
2. Holding the Responsible Party Accountable: Lawsuits can ensure that those who are responsible for wrongdoing are held accountable for their actions, deterring them and others from committing similar acts in the future.
3. Change in Policy or Behavior: In some cases, individuals or groups might sue to compel a person, company, or governmental body to change a harmful policy or behavior. For instance, class-action lawsuits against big corporations can lead to more responsible corporate behavior.
4. Enforcement of Rights: A lawsuit can be used to enforce one’s rights, whether they’re based on a contract, property ownership, civil rights, or other legal entitlements.
5. Public Awareness: High-profile lawsuits can draw attention to issues that might otherwise be overlooked. By bringing a matter to court, plaintiffs can raise public awareness about particular injustices, risks, or societal challenges.
6. Prevention: By suing, victims can send a message to the wrongdoer and others, aiming to prevent similar incidents in the future.
7. Personal or Emotional Closure: For some, a lawsuit provides a sense of justice or closure, especially if they feel they’ve been wronged or taken advantage of.

It is crucial to consult with one of our legal professionals about your potential claim and your legal right to compensation. Time is limited to fil your claim. So, call us today for your free case review.

What Type of Damages Could Be Recovered in a PFAS Testicular Cancer Lawsuit?

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are a group of human-made chemicals that have been used in a variety of industries around the world since the 1940s. Due to their resistance to grease, water, and oil, PFAS have been used in numerous products, such as non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, and some firefighting foams. Over time, concerns have arisen about their potential impact on human health and the environment. Among the health concerns associated with PFAS exposure are certain types of cancer, including testicular cancer.

If someone pursues a lawsuit claiming that PFAS exposure led to testicular cancer, the damages sought could include:

1. Medical Expenses: This includes past, present, and projected future medical costs related to diagnosing, treating, and managing the cancer and any associated complications.
2. Lost Wages: If the plaintiff missed work due to illness or treatment, they could seek compensation for the wages lost during that period. Additionally, if the disease impacts their ability to work in the future or diminishes their earning capacity, they may seek damages for future lost wages.
3. Pain and Suffering: These are non-economic damages that compensate a plaintiff for the physical pain and emotional anguish associated with the illness.
4. Loss of Consortium: This compensates a spouse or family member for the loss of companionship, love, care, or affection due to the illness or treatments.
5. Wrongful Death Damages: If the person exposed to PFAS passed away due to testicular cancer, their family or estate might pursue wrongful death damages. This could include funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and emotional suffering.
6. Punitive Damages: If the defendant’s actions were particularly reckless, malicious, or egregious, the court might award punitive damages to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct in the future.
7. Legal Fees and Costs: In some cases, if a plaintiff wins the lawsuit, the defendant may be ordered to pay the plaintiff’s attorney fees and other associated legal costs.

It’s essential to consult with an attorney who has experience with toxic tort cases or specific experience with PFAS litigation to better understand the potential damages in a particular situation. They can provide guidance on the strength of a claim, the potential for recovery, and the types of damages that may be appropriate to seek.

CONTACT PARKER WAICHMAN LLP FOR A FREE CASE REVIEW

Parker Waichman LLP helps families recover monetary compensation for harm caused by dangerous PFAS chemicals. For your free consultation, contact our national product liability law firm today by using our live chat or calling 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529).